I don't know what to say.
Life wouldn’t be long enough for this scum bag.
Some people call it a sling blade. I call it a Kaiser blade.
She only got 8 1/2 years? Wow. So, does that mean she will be out in what? A year or two? I wonder if the sentence was so light simply because the child had Down’s Syndrome or if the judge was just very lenient.
” sentenced her to the maximum possible — 8 1/2 years “
Obviously the maximum possible needs to change.
If I live to be 150 yrs. old, I’ll never understand these kinds of people.
My son was a preemie and I agonized over every 4 oz. of his weight. I used to put that poor kid through hell, trying to add ounces on his body.
I’m happy to report he is in his 20’s and eats like a horse.
I know Pete Ruddick and I know it would have rankled him to sentence her to only 8 1/2 years. I hope they can keep the older children together and adopt out the infant. I’m going to go check the ROA on this one.
What a despicable human being, if you can call her human. 8.5 years doesn’t seem long enough. She should be fixed so she can’t torture any more children and she should get 20 years at least. Oh and for several of those 20 years. I’d give her bread and water only, let her see how she likes it.
I think the judge is just as bad as she is. And should get a few years for his lack of compassion for the child. This is a horrific miscarriage of justice.
http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-rachel-perez-sentenced-rachel-perez-sentenced-to-102-months-in-prison-in-attic-abuse-case-20110526,0,6243907.story
http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-mother-of-boy-left-in-attic-found-guilty-of-attempted-murder-20110318,0,7614287.story
In men’s prisons, child abusers tend to be targeted by other prisoners. One would think that in women’s prisons, a child abuser would be in even more danger.
These horrible stories are indirectly used by the left to rail against home schooling or any other scenario where a child is not monitored (”protected”) by the state. Here in NJ that is always the second line in these news stories - “The children weren’t registered in the school district” (and it never because they are really home-schooled by independent-minded folks; it is because the “parent” on welfare simply spends the child’s portion of the welfare check on itself instead of buying clothes, soap, or toothpaste).
WTF is wrong with people?!!! If you don’t like or want your kid, just admit it already and give him/her up for adoption!!!! SOMEONE will take them off your hands.
This woman’s actions are beyond my comprehension.
No mention of a husband or baby-daddy(s).
Those poor kids. After that pitiful sentence, the gov’t will prolly make a huge effort to reunite the ‘family’. The mind boggles.