Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gen.Blather
The Law of Supply and Demand is a natural law, like gravity. Every time someone thinks they can violate it, or pass a restraining order against it, reality kicks in at some point. The usual case is exemplified by Nixon's freezing of gas prices, which only served to aggravate the shortage of gasoline throughout the country. Suppliers simply refused to sell the product at a loss. Just like farmers poured milk out on the ground (1950’s? 1960’s?) rather than accept artificially low prices. I remember the TV film footage, but not the year. Freezing health costs would have the same effect, unless health care providers are forced to work overtime - in which case there would be job slow down actions. Unofficial, of course, but effective nevertheless.

The real purpose for increasing the minimum wage is to allow union negotiators more leverage by pointing out that their members are far more qualified than mere minimum wage people.

4 posted on 06/01/2011 5:24:30 AM PDT by Pecos (Constitutionalist. Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Pecos
"The real purpose for increasing the minimum wage is to allow union negotiators more leverage by pointing out that their members are far more qualified than mere minimum wage people."

Having been on both sides of the table I see your point, but being on the company's side of the table when that "more qualified" quote comes up, I simply state that I can hire three people for the price of one union member and have them just as qualified within 6 months, and then it is at my discretion to increase the wages or not. But I run a plant in a right to work state which is a little easier to deal with.

5 posted on 06/01/2011 5:36:57 AM PDT by sniper63 (Ever wonder why the call themselves Hamas, but don't eat pork?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Pecos

You are correct about supply and demand but you are mistaken about the government’s role in some of those things. The dairymen pouring the milk on the ground was a public relations gimmick to get an increase in government subsidies. The politicians willingly complied. After that the government would then buy the excess milk, reduce it to cheese and butter fat, or dry it, and spend billions of dollars a year storying it in warehouses. They do the same with wheat, corn, and other agricultural products.

When we send tons of food to starving people or to disaster areas in other lands you don’t think they magically grow it overnight, do you, or that they buy it on the open market? What would that do to the market? They simply take it out of warehouses where they have been storing it, or more correctly, paying someone else to store it. Eventually, much of it is destroyed.

Since some have talked about LBJ, he was involved in another famous murder, that of a Dept. of Agriculture inspector who was out looking for grain silos supposedly owned by LBJ’s friend and fellow Texan, Billie Sol Estes. The problem was the silos did not exist. Estes was getting millions of dollars a year from the government to store grain but he wasn’t storing any.

If that was discovered it would lead directly back to LBJ so he had the inspector killed while he was out in the brush looking for the non-existent silos. When his body was discovered it was found that the inspector had been shot six times in the back with a bolt action rifle. The rifle was still on the scene. The coroner, a part of the Democrat political circle, ruled the death a suicide. See, there was a precedent for Slick Willie’s tactics.

Even now there is price fixing for milk. I have asked store managers at supermarkets in several states why, considering what it takes to produce each, the price of milk is higher than that of gasoline, usually. They generally say something along the lines of the state won’t let them sell below a certain price. That is supposedly to help the little grocers and keep the big boys from undercutting them. Sounds compassionate, doesn’t it?

Like all other government welfare programs the compassionate thing to do is let the market work. In this case the poor people are protected with government food stamps and we know about the many abuses there, and the milk producers’ profits are protected. So, we the taxpayer, get to pay more in increased taxes and as consumers in the increase in the price of milk.

Lovely little scheme. Just not for us.


31 posted on 06/02/2011 12:43:32 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (I retain the right to be inconsistent, contradictory and even flat-out wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson