Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leader of Brady Group Gloats About Coming Gun Ban ‘Proposals’
Ammoland.com ^ | June 10th, 2011 | Alan Korwin

Posted on 06/11/2011 5:33:46 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: BCR #226

You should read some articles about gun ban down here in Australia. Gun crime actually went up when they put restrictive gun ownership on people. A friend here had a .22 long rifle for shooting varmints on her ranch - had to fill out 23 pages of forms. She just gave up.


61 posted on 06/13/2011 1:17:15 PM PDT by SkyDancer (It's not the police that protect our rights, it's our military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Oh, I know how Rebecca “the bobblehead” Peterson F’ed you guys down there.

That woman is insane. Out of every country in the world, given the dangerous species of animals you have down there, you’d think that it’d be common sense that guns are a necessity.

Stupidity should be painful but for the people instigating this crap, not the folks like yourself who have to suffer because of it.


62 posted on 06/13/2011 1:30:12 PM PDT by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
You left out Oklahoma.

Hmmm. Two former FedGov employees, one with connections to Muslims in the Phillipines, and the other a Special Forces trainee who had a *private interview* with a couple of spooks from an unnamed unit, then dropped out of his SF qualification course.

Then, when they were nosing around Texas and Arizona, they were accompanied by a German ex-military intelligence spook, whose father is Gunther Strassmeir, Helmut Kohl's secretary of state, who had been reporting to the local BATF office...among others

Nope, I don't think OKC goes on the list.

63 posted on 06/13/2011 1:43:17 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: archy

I still hear rumors about the German. He is here and there where ever there is potential turmoil. Very odd movements, one day someone will take exception to his actions.


64 posted on 06/13/2011 1:53:36 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Demons run when a good man goes to war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

Well I’m a Yank working down here and I do get into gun issues. I told them how many guns we have at home and they want to know why. Made for an interesting evening.


65 posted on 06/13/2011 2:13:32 PM PDT by SkyDancer (It's not the police that protect our rights, it's our military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I bet. I still don’t get how those folks let themselves be run under the bus like that.


66 posted on 06/13/2011 5:01:44 PM PDT by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

It gets more interesting when I explain how our electoral system works and what the difference is between our states and their states. I’ve been at the pub evenings until way late.


67 posted on 06/13/2011 9:02:35 PM PDT by SkyDancer (It's not the police that protect our rights, it's our military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
"Then, by extension, a “single-issue” platform like the NRA’s would be similarly stupid. The NRA cannot endorse a Democrat because of what they might do on other issues, so that would negate the single-issue platform and concept.

But, the NRA IS a single-issue organization. Hedging their endorsements on other issues is simply foolish. The endorsement of the NRA should mean SOMETHING, other than a de-facto RNC stamp of approval."

You're mistaken if you think the NRA only lobbies on gun legislation. They lobbied very prominently against McCain/Feingold, and rightfully so, but that blows your point out of the water. Also, withholding endorsements of Democrats does not make them a rubber stamp for the Republican party, since they can withhold those endorsements as well. Endorsing Democrats who are good on guns only strengthens the Democratic Party since those candidates can and do support their party on most other things, such as ObamaCare. A national organization has to have a wider strategy than just thinking about a single candidate.

68 posted on 06/14/2011 2:56:08 PM PDT by Batrachian (Prepare for four more years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

They lobbied against McCain/Feingold because it would have restricted their ability to run advocacy ads right before an election. They were defending their own rights to act as a proponent for 2A issues.

So, NO, it doesn’t blow my point “out of the water”.

How can you say that withholding endorsements from QUALIFIED democrats doesn’t make them a rubber stamp? If they do so, they’re doing it purely based on political party. If they withhold endorsements from Republican candidates, under your thinking, it’s not due to party, but due to 2A qualifications. That’s a DOUBLE STANDARD.

Again, all this does is bring light to my point about single-issue advocacy groups and platforms - they’re a double-edged sword.


69 posted on 06/15/2011 5:33:06 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Would you vote for a Democrat?


70 posted on 06/15/2011 10:35:49 AM PDT by Batrachian (Prepare for four more years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

I’m not a single issue voter (usually), so I vote the party ticket unless a Republican strikes me as a scumbag. I cannot recall the last time I voted for a Democrat. However, I clearly identify myself as a Republican, so I vote for Republicans.

If I were the NRA, I would have to identify myself as a Republican arm if I only voted for (endorsed) Republicans. I could no longer claim to be a single-issue advocacy group, becaue I’d really only be advocating for the Republican party.


71 posted on 06/15/2011 10:42:49 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson