Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilovesarah2012

> And I just won’t vote for someone from MA. That state is evil.

I am no Romney fan. No, I am not.

However, would you prefer 4 more years of Chicago commie thug politics, or the soft socialism of a Romney?


9 posted on 06/14/2011 6:15:09 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Westbrook
would you prefer 4 more years of Chicago commie thug politics, or the soft socialism of a Romney?

Obama lies to your face.

Romney stabs you in the back.

You decide.

10 posted on 06/14/2011 6:17:09 AM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (I'm called a 'teabagger'? Well, get over here liberal and I'll show you what that means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook
However, would you prefer 4 more years of Chicago commie thug politics, or the soft socialism of a Romney?

Voting for the lesser of two evils is what got us into this mess. I simply won't cast a vote for president if Romney gets the nomination.
15 posted on 06/14/2011 6:21:51 AM PDT by arderkrag (Georgia is God's Country.----------In the same way Rush is balance, I am consensus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

I’ll worry about that when he gets the nomination.


16 posted on 06/14/2011 6:22:08 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

I’ll take the chicago thugs. The longer they are around the more pissed off everyone gets at liberals in general. It’s a race between the populace getting angry enough to do something decisive and the destruction of the country.
With romney we get the death of a thousand cuts.


42 posted on 06/14/2011 7:17:46 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

“However, would you prefer 4 more years of Chicago commie thug politics, or the soft socialism of a Romney?”

This is actually a very good question, and I suspect it may be on the minds of many thinking conservatives.

Suppose Romney does get the nomination. Then what? Will he be Obama’s Reagan? That is, will Romney undo the damage Obama has done and set this nation back on a positive course? No, clearly not.

Is Romney much different than Obama? Probably not. Romney embraces the worst of Obammunism, including socialized medicine (taking from the haves and gifting the have-nots), as well as embracing the Marxist fairy tail of global warming. Heck, Romney even helped invent Obamacare.

So what to do? Vote for Romney? Vote for Obama? Vote for some 3rd party loser? Not vote?

I personally am inclined to vote for Obama, because Obama got us in this mess with his rampant and deliberately destructive socialism. I say let him finish the job. Let him and his party own his and their legacy forever. Let the people of this country make no mistake about what Democrats are all about and what they really do when they rule.

In future elections, at least for a generation or two, the choices will then be clear based on past results. Hopefully our people will have learned their lessons and will choose prosperity over tyranny. If not, then unfortunately for we who work and think and know better, the majority will deserve the government they select. And for you and I? Then it’s time to start a new country within this country. It’s time to select a few good states and migrate there en masse and take over. It’s time to go Galt.


45 posted on 06/14/2011 7:39:26 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook
However, would you prefer 4 more years of Chicago commie thug politics, or the soft socialism of a Romney?

The soft socialism (or "compassionate conservatism") of Bush gave us Dem control of Congress, followed by Obama.

Two years of Obama produced conservative control of a lot more states after the 2010 elections.

We cannot afford a candidate who does not enthuse the Republican base. We cannot afford to have any Republican stay home in 2012.

62 posted on 06/14/2011 8:57:05 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson