Posted on 06/15/2011 8:22:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
If either the GOP contenders or President Obama plan on dismissing Michele Bachmann’s candidacy out of hand because she represents the Tea Party, they ought to think twice.
In the war of economics and business, where these campaigns will likely be won or lost, Bachmann has shown the strongest practical grasp on issues of the American economy vs. any of the candidates in the race.
Certainly she has the academic and business experience for her views on the economy to be taken seriously. "After high school, meanwhile, the disciplined Bachmann spent time on a Kibbutz in Israel, graduated from Winona State University with a bachelor's of arts, got her law degree at Oral Roberts University, and followed up with a tax law degree from the exclusive William & Mary Law School," says USNews, calling her a "smart version of Sarah Palin."
Bachmann then worked as a tax attorney for the IRS.
While Mitt Romney can tout his experience on Wall Street, that experience is becoming more and more problematic as Republican voters become disenchanted with too-big-to-fail institutions that control the markets in the U.S.
GOP voters, who used to cozy up to Wall Street, suddenly understand that, at least at the top, Wall Street executives are often for sale to whichever side is in power.
That’s part of the reason why Obamneycare presents such a potent challenge to Romney.
Government-crafted schemes like Obamacare and Romneycare are looking more and more to voters like Big Government, Big Labor and Big Business sitting down in a smoke-filled room to decide the winners and losers, because that’s what happens.
And since the rest of us don’t have a seat at the table, guess who buys the cigars?
Michele Bachmann on the other hand, as a member of the House Committee on Financial Services, has shown a great deal of insight into where the economy has gone wrong. And it’s the insight of an outsider looking in.
On the first day of the new Republican majority, Bachmann introduced legislation to repeal Barney Frank’s so-called reform of Wall Street, called Dodd-Frank, one of those Big Government, Big Business, Big Labor joint ventures.
Bachmann was blasted at the time by her Democrat critics as being a stooge for Wall Street. But as time goes on, it’s becoming clearer that Bachmann was standing up for the health of the economy, while Chris Dodd and Barney Frank were in the pockets of the banks and Wall Street.
Bachmann proved to be way out in front of her colleagues on both sides of the aisle. At the time, a Dodd-Frank repeal was considered a loser for the GOP. Time, however, has a funny way of revealing facts.
Given the recent disclosures regarding Dodd-Frank author Barney Frank’s love interest with a top executive at Fannie Mae, Bachmann practically called out the ménage à trois of Big Government, Big Labor and Big Business by name:
“Dodd-Frank also failed to address the taxpayer-funded liabilities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,” says Bachmann calling for repeal of Dodd-Frank. “Real financial regulatory reform must deal with these lenders who were a leading cause of our economic recession. True reform must also end the bailout mindset that was perpetuated by the last Congress. I am proud to work towards repeal of Dodd-Frank because Congress must protect the taxpayers, instead of handing out favors to Wall Street.”
As the housing markets threaten to make new lows, Bachmann’s words may not just be empty rhetoric on the pages of a congressional archive, either. There is growing concern that if the housing market doesn’t start to reverse trend that we could have a second wave of too-big-to-fail mortgage failures, necessitating bailouts of more big banks.
Far from insulating the U.S. economy from the failures of the housing sector, Dodd-Frank has further solidified the grip housing has on the economy.
“The villains? An unholy alliance between Wall Street, the Democratic establishment, community organizing groups like ACORN and La Raza, and politicians like Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi and Henry Cisneros” says Fanniegate Is Really Bad News For Democrats at BusinessInsider.com.
"We're not seeing a very forceful step on the too-big-to-fail problem," said Carmen Reinhart, an economist at the University of Maryland according to NPR regarding Dodd-Frank. "If there's any doubt that the crisis may be systemic, we will bail out again."
Already, the Congressional Budget Office is saying that Obama’s estimate of $130 billion to bail out Fannie and Freddie will be closer to $317 billion.
Obama and Barney Frank have gone from calling for the dismantling of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to turning over the whole U.S. housing sector to it.
That’s because the White House never had any intention of reforming the mortgage market any more than Chris Dodd or Barney Frank intended to reform Wall Street’s too-big-to-fail problem.
“Check out page 11 of the White House's recent proposal to Congress for ‘reforming’ the toxic twins,” writes Investors Business Daily. “It insists Fannie and Freddie's role in financing affordable-housing is ‘vital.’ And that ‘any changes should occur at a measured pace that preserves widespread access to affordable mortgages for lower-income Americans.’"
A “measured pace” is Obamaspeak for no reform at all.
In fact, the U.S. has strengthened its guarantees to bail out the housing market through Fannie and Freddie and the final tab may be over $1 trillion to the U.S taxpayers, not including loss of home value.
“Before their 2008 collapse, that guarantee was implicit; now it is more straightforward. Fannie and Freddie are fully controlled (and mostly owned) by Washington,” reports the National Review, “their mortgage activities are sustained by U.S. taxpayers; and their bonds are widely considered to be as safe (or nearly as safe) as Treasury bills.”
For 2012, the subtext of the campaigns will likely be the intended consequences of legislation, like Dodd-Frank, that doesn’t even attempt to address the problems that they are supposed to ameliorate.
Dodd-Frank is the textbook example of what’s wrong with Washington since it harms the economy without addressing many of the systemic problems in the economy as it was hailed to. It also lies at the heart of the economic debate on the direction of the country. It’s the ultimate insider remedy, authored by insiders for insiders.
By positioning herself against Dodd-Frank, Michele Bachmann could end up parlaying her outside appeal into a contending campaign for the presidency.
Interesting resume
As usual, Kaslin, your posts are right at the heart of the current situation.
New tagline alert:
Bachmann is more formidable than Palin, IMHO, although she’s probably more gaffe-prone.
read this please re: our conversation yesterday
More formal education? yes.
Better educated? Arguable.
Smarter? Again arguable
I'd say so far, Governor Palin has a better ROI on her education investment...
Romney’s experience wasn’t exactly ‘on Wall Street’. He was with a Boston-based consulting company and then started the private equity and venture capital offshoot of that firm.
Michele is the real deal. A strong coservative fighter.
coservative=conservative
Black men were granted the right to vote with the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870, white women were granted the right to vote with the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920 - 50 years later!
I don't think women are willing to wait that long for the first female president. Nor should they.
No. She's a lawyer and tax attorney--she's a rules expert.
Referees are also rules experts, but would hire a referee to coach your team? No, you'd hire someone that is an expert on playing the game.
I got in this same argument with someone on Twitter yesterday. The argued that because Romney was a lawyer, he was the most qualified to fix our problems. I couldn't agree less.
Lawyers are not problem solvers, they are rules experts--people who know how to take advantage of the current rules to their own benefit. We need to break out of the lawyer/politican mold. That goes for conservative lawyers as well.
The jokes just write themselves, don't they?
Great tagline
“She’s a lawyer and tax attorney”
She’s actually a member of Congress and a Tea Party activist.
You are listing her background information and using that to totally define her for then, now, and all time to come.
She is running for President, and for that, you use everything you ever were and are and will become to help you. Everything. Even being a mother of five children born to her and 23 foster kids, and even having been married to the same man for 33 years.
Toss the tunnel vision. Open your eyes as wide as possible. You will be able to see more.
This gets me. There is no "Tea Party". There is only a diverse group of people who are demanding fiscal responsibility on the part of the Feds.
Romney's business experience is in the levereged buyout business (Romney was actually one of the original creators of the industry). This should give everyone considering him pause, as the rise of the leveraged buyout industry has played havoc with American business.
In a nutshell, it is "house flipping" only with businesses instead of houses.
It has forced businesses to abandon long term plans and focus almost exclusivly on the short term to prevent becomming the target of a hostile leveraged buyout and being "flipped."
Leveraged buyout artists like Romney are in the same league as ambulance chasing trial lawyers. They don't add anything to the economy, they're just trying to take advantage of someone in trouble so they can make a quick buck.
And Rick Perry who tries to glom on to the TP movement - is a total fake. His cronies want to sell all our infrastructure to foreign interests and have all our highways become tollways.
See: http://www.corridorwatch.com
bttt
Although I found that he had a law degree from Harvard, I couldn't find anything that he practiced law
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.