Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unflippingbelievable! Sarah Palin trademarks her name
mailonline ^ | 20th June 2011 | David Gardner

Posted on 06/20/2011 3:40:49 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Sacajaweau

Yeah entrepeneurs selling T-shirts , buttons , bumper stickers internet porn sites featuring bestiality porn would be interfered with .

Sorry gotta side with the Palins on this one. The MSM would be investors in the beast porn site featuring Sarah Palins name in the title.


21 posted on 06/20/2011 3:59:04 PM PDT by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000
WAIT, the Liberals all say that Sarah Palin [tm] is dumb and stupid and ..../sarc

And just WHO gets the last laugh?

LOVE IT! The Obummer didn't think of it. Weiner-weiner didn't think of it. The burr under the liberal's blanket did!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahaha
You Betcha!
22 posted on 06/20/2011 3:59:28 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (I am a US Citizen, A Patriot, A TEA Partier, An Oath Keeper, A Voter, An Auburn Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
People making money emblazoning someone else’s name on stuff without their permission or profit participation aren’t entrepreneurs, they’re crooks. They’re why famous people need to trademark their names.

Perhaps Sarah is doing that to discourage angry drunken trolls like this:


23 posted on 06/20/2011 3:59:53 PM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: C210N
You reeeeeally need to note when someone puts a smile after a comment.
24 posted on 06/20/2011 3:59:54 PM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

This doesn’t stop satire, public figures and trademarked items are still fair game to satire under fair use. It stops merchandising.


25 posted on 06/20/2011 4:00:22 PM PDT by discostu (Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Good for Sarah!


26 posted on 06/20/2011 4:01:03 PM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Didn’t somebody try to put up a fake blog under her name a couple of years ago?


27 posted on 06/20/2011 4:01:45 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000
From a tread last week:

Sarah, Bristol Palin to Get Their Trademarks (to protect their names) ^

The bids by Sarah Palin and her daughter Bristol Palin to trademark their names and images have cleared a major hurdle and should soon be approved for the potential presidential candidate and her Dancing With the Stars child.

Sources close to the process tell our Suzi Parker that nobody challenged Sarah Palin's trademark application. Today is the deadline to do so. They also say that Bristol Palin's went unchallenged. That deadline passed June 10.

Each should receive their trademark within three months, said the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

end snip

28 posted on 06/20/2011 4:01:57 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bockscar
I believe such would be covered under “fair use”.

For example - Mickey Mouse is a trademark of Disney.

You can talk about Mickey Mouse - write a story about Mickey Mouse - write the name Mickey Mouse; but if you try to sell a T-shirt that says “Mickey Mouse” you had better watch out!

29 posted on 06/20/2011 4:01:59 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Always remember what happened to Bill Watterson, failed to TM Calvin and Hobbes and a lot of people not him made a lot of money with that Calvin peeing on a logo thing.


30 posted on 06/20/2011 4:02:10 PM PDT by discostu (Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated

I posted a comment there, but it’s relegated to “worst” comments. It would be fitting to freep it and make it one of the best, thus first seen, comments. It seems ALL PRO-Sarah comments are worst received.

D.C. Wright USMC Retired


31 posted on 06/20/2011 4:04:30 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb

He’d still be satire, fair use. It stops the equivalent of Calvin peeing on a logo. Even positive knockoff people are making knockoffs and not filtering any of that money over to the person whose name they’re using.


32 posted on 06/20/2011 4:04:38 PM PDT by discostu (Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Sorry....I don’t believe in this. Entrepeneurs are put out of business...shirts, buttons, bumper stickers, mugs

Wrong - the very names with the greatest profit potential are, amazingly enough, the most vigorously protected. Try selling coffee mugs with a bootleg Harley logo on them and see what happens. Included in the name owner's rights is the right to select those individuals authorized to utilize the name in the market. You wouldn't want some scuz like Katie Couric making money flogging Sarah Palin glasses, would you? The question is its answer.

33 posted on 06/20/2011 4:04:58 PM PDT by Bedford Forrest (Roger, Contact, Judy, Out. Fox One. Splash one.<I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I am not familiar with copyright law, but for public figures like Palin there are probably some uses of the name or image that can’t be prevented. For example, if Mad magazine wanted to do a Palin satire with Alfred E. Neuman made up to look like her on the cover, that’s probably protected free speech. But there are probably gray areas where protected speech verges into commercial exploitation.


34 posted on 06/20/2011 4:05:07 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

It's a genius stroke. If the libs want to defame her, they now have to pay royalties to do so. And she can refuse them if she so chooses. And she can shut down those who don't play by the rules. I love it. There just are not a heckuva a lot of things I don't like about Sarah Palin. If she teams up with Herman Cain ... Wow! A female governor and black businessman team up to show the nation that minority status doesn't mean squat to conservatives as long as conservative principles are upheld. When they win ... and they would win ... liberal heads will spin and explode.


35 posted on 06/20/2011 4:05:23 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000
It is the latest attempt by Mrs Palin to profit from her fame

Unlike the sales of, say, Barack Hussein Obama's phony "autobiography", or the Clinton memoirs?

36 posted on 06/20/2011 4:05:47 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH
Not in the least. Parody is protected.

You can sell T-shirts making fun of Mickey Mouse - call him Mickey Rat or whatnot - but if you sell a T-shirt that just says “Mickey Mouse” and/or has his picture - that is a violation. The intent has to be to satirize or make fun of it - you can't just piggyback on the name and image someone else has tradmarked.

37 posted on 06/20/2011 4:05:58 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bockscar

>>>>Does this mean sites like freerepublic will have to pay her to post her name?

Fair use is OK for reporting of current events and expression of political opinion and commentary/criticism. At least it is for now... Dear Leader could Executive Order something to the contrary, and it might make it past a court or two - but I don’t think it would make it by SCOTUS with its present membership.


38 posted on 06/20/2011 4:06:17 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: deport

oops. I must have missed that thread. I did a search on the title and all that. Nothing came up.


40 posted on 06/20/2011 4:07:25 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000 (The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson