Posted on 07/04/2011 6:54:41 PM PDT by The Bronze Titan
If she runs, I’m behind her 100%.
I don’t have to explain anything to anyone.
OK,first time I saw the like.
Dudes been around a long time,hate to see an old timer zotted over a little dig at Rush.
I’m curious and honestly not trying to be facetious but why do you come on these threads? You convinced she’s not running and from everything I’ve read I don’t think you care for her all that much and that’s okay. So why continue to bother people on these threads? I’m sure there are plenty of topics you enjoy. What do you get out of denigrating your fellow freepers on nearly every thread? Honestly, if you’re convinced she isn’t running why not just leave these threads to those who do think she is or are hoping she will. You aren’t going to change your opinion and those who support her aren’t going to change theirs so why create all this bad blood? I’m betting you have plenty in common with people here beyond their support of Palin. Debate is fine and even enlightening but this has become an opportunity to insult (and yes, calling her “the trademark” IS an insult) her supporters. It’s not like you even try to have a genuine, respectful debate, so why bother?
Cindie
No Michele Bachmann or Ed Rollins listed?
You folks need to get some perspective and sanity quickly or you'll kill a Palin campaign faster than anything going.
That looks like the entire Country Club.
Pray for America
457 days? The nomination will be history long before then.
My ballot gets submitted less than 200 days from now.
I HOPE she runs and thought that today, the Fourth of July would be the day she announced. I now fear that she is NOT running since this day has passed.
.
Kind of surprised if she runs now...IMHO
Awesome.
An Enemies List.
Those are always a good idea.
Sunday, Sept. 11, 2011. The war on domestic terrorism begins!
How about FOX’s Dana Perugino?
Objectively more signs point to "not running" than running. I noticed no one admitting being wrong about her candidacy announcement on July 4. There was a thread this morning about an AK radio show just in case it happened.
Yet, if you suggest she isn't running or might not run, you're smeared as having PDS by those claiming to be supporters. I have to wonder if they really are or not.
You can almost hear, 'How dare you question the truth of inevitability?! Unbeliever! Attack! Attack!,' in some posts.
If she forgoes 2012 or even if fairly defeated for the nomination, a lot of people will go off the deep end. It's scary.
It runs off people who would naturally support her candidacy. At times I wonder if they actually know this and work to that end.
What??
The poster made a list of people who definitively say that Palin isn't running. The poster wishes to hold these people accountable for their statements if they are wrong.
And you call that what?...an enemies list??
LOL!
Another. One.
I have wondered how many votes a candidate would get by saying outright that if elected the entire weight of the government would be harnessed to see that their predecessor and top level administration do serious prison time. A thought experiment.
Cheers!
If pundits had to pay a penalty for every wrong prediction... well I’d hate to be Dick Morris.
Will there also be a list prepared of the people who said they believe she IS running?
Will they also be held accountable? If she doesn't run, should they apologize? If yes, to whom? If no, why not?
Well, 98.7% of the time anyway.
He commits an act of PDS, then tries deflecting it in the post above. This may help explain it.
The nature of the PDSer
In a time not so very long ago, a man of logic, reason and rationality, upset by the injustice of the mindless and their baseless attacks upon his candidate of choice, did undertake a quest to discover the nature of the PDS’er.
And so did the man travel to the far corners of the Earth, for in his travels he could find no wisdom, nor wise man, to satisfactorily explain the root cause of Palin Derangement Syndrome, nor it’s effect on those so smitten. It was not until a chance encounter with a Zen Master high atop a remote mountain in Tibet that our hero found his answer.
“To discover the nature of the PDS’er,” said the Zen Master, One must understand the logic of why the sky is yellow.”
Confused by the sage words of the old wise man, our hero listened intently as the knowledge of the ages sprung forth from his old and weathered lips...
“To discover the nature of the PDS’er, One must understand the fact that dogs meow and cats bark at passing cars.”
“To discover the nature of the PDS’er, One must understand the reason why the sun shines brightly in the night sky.”
For what seemed like hours the Zen Master spoke thusly until finally our hero looked upon him and said “Master, dogs do not meow, nor cats bark. The sky is not yellow but blue and the sun shines in it by day, not by night. To spout such nonsense is neither logical, nor rational, nor factual. In fact, you’d have to be nuts to believe any of that!”
And so did our hero gain enlightenment into the nature of the PDS’er.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.