This article is senseless. Those pundits who predict that Sarah will not run will have no more egg on their face if she does run than those pundits who predict that she will run will have if she does not run. In either case it would be a simple matter of getting a prediction wrong. Such an occasion is hardly ruinous for a pundit’s career. The bigger problem is getting a large proportion of their predictions wring.
Majority of the pundits opinions or predictions are wrong on both sides of the aisle, the only predictions that are correct are those that a source close to the situation tells them what is about to happen days or weeks ahead. So they are more like a TMZ reporter who has sources and talks like they are in the know
No, it's not senseless. It exposes the 'anti-Palin' landscape for what it is. Tell me what 'other' person is everyone pontificating about, much less obssesed, in saying 'he/she' won't run?