Replies

AQUITTAL?????!!!!!!!!

9 posted on 07/05/2011 7:41:04 AM PDT by FrdmLvr

15 posted on 07/05/2011 7:43:54 AM PDT by wideawake

That’s what I heard her say...maybe she meant of FIRST degree murder..

16 posted on 07/05/2011 7:44:42 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)

AQUITTAL?????!!!!!!!!

Only in patton and patriot08's wildest dreams

347 posted on 07/05/2011 11:11:44 AM PDT by John D

Lack of evidence. If I was a juror, this is exactly what I would have done — there is evidence of lying to police, but there isn’t adequate evidence that she murdered the child vs. the child dying by any other means. There’s something fishy going on, but with the evidence I wouldn’t be able to distinguish between murder vs. an accident and a cover-up. Maybe that makes me a cold-hearted SOB, but following the law that’s what I would have rendered.

Maybe she did it. Maybe she didn’t, and her father put the body under the tree that she couldn’t have moved by herself. If the evidence doesn’t let me distinguish between the two, I’d be forced to acquit.

699 posted on 07/05/2011 11:48:29 AM PDT by Windcatcher (Obama is a COMMUNIST and the MSM is his armband-wearing propaganda machine.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794