Posted on 07/19/2011 12:05:34 AM PDT by Borough Park
LONDON Abu Sohaib spends most of his time online these days, following the news from his native Libya. He is in constant contact with friends on the ground there, helping them map out strategy to fight the rule of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.
I would like to be there myself; I tried to go, he said, pausing to look at the car keys in front of him. But Tunisia and Egypt wouldnt let me in even after their revolution.
Abu Sohaib, his nom de guerre, is on a watch list for suspected terrorists not only in Libya and its neighboring countries, but also in some European countries. He is a senior commander of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a former militant organization that once was aligned with Al Qaeda. The New York Times is withholding his real name because he said he fears for his safety.
Today, members of the group have renounced Al Qaeda and are part of the mosaic of rebel fighters united under the umbrella of the Transitional National Council, the opposition leadership that the United States formally recognized as Libyas legitimate government on Friday.
American, European and Arab intelligence services acknowledge that they are worried about the influence that the former groups members might exert over Libya after Colonel Qaddafi is gone, and they are trying to assess their influence and any lingering links to Al Qaeda.
-snip-
Libyans have held positions in the Qaeda ranks in the past, with the most prominent men being Abu Laith al-Libi and Abu Yahya al-Libi. It is easy to change a name and say, We are not part of Al Qaeda, but the question is if they have changed their ideology and I doubt it, said a senior Arab intelligence official.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
The Times, once “the Paper of Record” and now the propaganda arm of the Far Left, helping their hero, Premier Obama, perpetuate the lie that a majority of Libyans - and certainly “our type” of Libyans - want Gaddhai removed.
And Great Britain wonders why they have problems with their Muslim population.
Does anyone see a problem with this?
Clearly the NY Times does not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.