Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

16 Countries, Including Mexico, File Briefs Against New Alabama Immigration Law
FoxNews ^ | August 04, 2011

Posted on 08/04/2011 6:35:05 PM PDT by Steelfish

16 Countries, Including Mexico, File Briefs Against New Alabama Immigration Law August 04, 2011

In an effort to ensure their citizens are treated fairly in Alabama, 16 nations, including Mexico, filed briefs against the state’s controversial new immigration law that has already drawn fire from the U.S. Department of Justice.

Edward Still, a Birmingham attorney who filed the brief, told The Montgomery Advertiser that the nations “want to have one immigration law and not 50.” "Mexico has an interest in protecting its citizens and ensuring that their ethnicity is not used as basis for state-sanctioned acts of bias and discrimination," the brief said, according to the paper.

Criticism for the law, which is said to be the strictest state-level immigration law in the country, has been fierce and swift. Besides the DOJ’s lawsuit, the Roman Catholic Church, three dozen plaintiffs represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center have all filed lawsuits against the state’s governor, The Montgomery Advertiser reported.

Gov. Robert Bentley signed the law naming it a crime to be an undocumented immigrant in Alabama and allowing law enforcement officials to detain individuals if they have a "reasonable suspicion" of being in the country illegally. The law also makes it illegal to give undocumented immigrants rides and requires school districts to check on the immigration status of students who enroll.

The Justice Department argues that the states are overstepping their authority by wading into something that is a strictly federal responsibility: immigration enforcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: aclu; aliens; argentina; boliva; brazil; colombia; illegalaliens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2011 6:35:09 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

No standing.


2 posted on 08/04/2011 6:36:18 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Since when do these countries have any standing in our courts? Their briefs belong in the garbage can. If their citizens are here illegally then deport them and send a bill or deduct from any aid they get. Better yet, put the illegals to work building the fence on the border.


3 posted on 08/04/2011 6:37:57 PM PDT by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JMS

F-— Em!


4 posted on 08/04/2011 6:39:20 PM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (Tag line under construction, please mind the gap!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“the Roman Catholic Church, three dozen plaintiffs represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center have all filed lawsuits against the state’s governor”

Biting my tongue....


5 posted on 08/04/2011 6:39:30 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Let them eat cake. We are sovereign and so is Alabama even standing alone. These people don’t get to tell Alabama what laws it can or cannot make.


6 posted on 08/04/2011 6:39:59 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Then why don’t we adopt Mexico’s policy of instant imprisonment? How totally stupid! Let’s offer to use Mexico’s law . . . How about that?


7 posted on 08/04/2011 6:41:41 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

What did 0 have to do with this?

Sorry, I don’t trust that POS on inch. It’s not beneath him to have friends of friends of friends go about getting these countries to do this.

Oh and Screwwwwwwwwwwww them!


8 posted on 08/04/2011 6:42:06 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (The democRATS—just doing the groundwork for al Qaeda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I have a constitutional amendment to address this nonsense:

“No non-U.S. government, non-U.S. business, non-U.S. organization, or non-U.S. citizen shall have access to any civil court in the United States except as a direct signatory to a civil contract signed in the United States, where said civil contract is in dispute.”


9 posted on 08/04/2011 6:43:23 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Pound salt!


10 posted on 08/04/2011 6:44:13 PM PDT by rsobin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

ROLL TIDE


11 posted on 08/04/2011 6:44:47 PM PDT by silentreignofheroes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

The state of Alabama should require the Catholic Church to pay real estate taxes on all their churches and other properties in Alabama in order to pay the costs of illegal immigration.


12 posted on 08/04/2011 6:46:28 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The top 1% earn 20% of America's income yet they pay 40% of all federal income taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I read of a recent case where it was determined that mexico truly did not have standing... screw them anyway. Just as Texas shown the mexican bandits that we will snuff one of theirs if they are given the death penalty. We may have to invade mexico... and this time there will be no nation building.

LLS

13 posted on 08/04/2011 6:46:39 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (juan mccain certified Al Palin Hobbit Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Don’t like our Law? Stay the hell outta our State.

Try being “illegal” in Mexico, or half the Countries “protesting”...it won’t be pretty.


14 posted on 08/04/2011 6:48:50 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

south america doesn’t like us messin with their middle men in the drug biz. thats why.u see,they send thier drug sales men to the south to sell drugs to pimps/hoes/and obama supporters,,so if u arrest them,it messes up the whole system!!!


15 posted on 08/04/2011 6:50:28 PM PDT by Liberals_R_BiPolar_Turkeys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This should be used in a commercial, the Obama justice department is suing states that are trying to protect themselves against illegal immigration. It is bad enough that the federal government isn’t doing anything but they are actually attacking the states that are doing the job the federal government refuses to.


16 posted on 08/04/2011 6:53:43 PM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Where is congress on this???? Oh thats right, they’re silent. Vote the ba*tards out!!!!!


17 posted on 08/04/2011 6:55:13 PM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
... 16 nations, including Mexico, filed briefs against the state’s controversial new immigration law ...

Should read:

... 16 nations, including Mexico, filed controversial briefs against the state’s new immigration law ...

18 posted on 08/04/2011 6:56:28 PM PDT by Isabel C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“... the nations “want to have one immigration law and not 50.”

Yeah, well my daughter wants a pony and a unicorn but she isn’t going to get either one from me.

Hey Mexico, I’ve got a great reality check for you: Try crapping in your right hand and “wanting” in your left and see which hand fills up first.

Ridiculous.


19 posted on 08/04/2011 6:58:41 PM PDT by Ernie Kaputnik ((It's a mad, mad, mad world.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The 14th Amendment provides only that illegal aliens not be denied equality before the law ~ it doesn't exempt them from state legislation.

If the state requires you to present a lawful ID to the cops under certain circumtances, it's enough that everybody is subject to the ID look-see. You don't have an ID, they should be able to haul you in and find your identity out by other means, as well as your immigration status.

Doesn't anyone ever read the 14th amendment anymore? Or is it they only go as far as the "Anchor Baby" part?

20 posted on 08/04/2011 7:02:44 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson