Apparently, the only privacy left to protect is Obama's right to lie.
If a person knowingly lies about being born in a state, and the said state has evidence proving the lie, can they withhold the evidence citing the person's "right to lie," and therefore the state would be violating that right by disclosing the truth of the lie?
That kind of twisted logic would destroy our legal system if it is ever argued that lying is a privacy right that cannot be challenged by the state without violating the "privacy" of the lier.
-PJ
If anyone can prove that Zero lied about his eligibility to campaign for the Presidency, can you imagine the law suits brought after he fraudulently raised almost $1 BILLION in funds? A lot of these people are already very unhappy with the performance of their chosen messiah.