Perhaps, but he never corrected his earlier story, so I have to assume they're trying to keep their readers believing this, which explains why they would redact the name of the registrar. There's really no other reason to block that out.
Speaking of redacted information, WND really dropped the ball here. The original image of the reverse side they posted had all the text bleeding through, so you could see the birth certificate number, which they blocked out on the other side. When you compare this number to Obama's it's obvious why they blocked it out--despite being born two weeks after Obama, the person's birther certificate has a lower number, defeating one of the main arguments for Obama's being fake.