Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
I know they have to go off, that's what they do, but wouldn't it be nice to tap into that geotherm energy and make electricity bigtime to help stall and minimize the more dangerous ones.

Sure it would be expensive & dangerous, but we already do that with nukes so have at it, There's more energy there anyway.

15 posted on 10/14/2011 3:00:36 PM PDT by de.rm ('Most people never believe anything you tell them unless it isn't true."-Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: de.rm

while you are tecnically correct, nuclear energy is far easier to control.


16 posted on 10/14/2011 3:02:59 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: de.rm

while you are tecnically correct, nuclear energy is far easier to control.


17 posted on 10/14/2011 3:03:09 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: de.rm

Must have something to do with underground magma passages, that ‘Jokull goes off followed by Katla when there’s a surge of that stuff.

If the energy in that magma could be tapped, it would be awesome. It would light up Iceland without even trying. We’re talking tides of molten rock here, and scarcely anything is known to man that would withstand it. Some very refractory ceramics and tungsten, and that’s about it. If for production of work (e.g. electricity) there would need to be a heat sink to dump waste heat to, out of thermodynamic necessity. Perhaps to the ocean, but the global warmists would have a kitten.


23 posted on 10/14/2011 3:07:33 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson