In terms of the battlefield, PD, I think it’s better to face an enemy than a unrecognized traitor in your midst. The 2nd is deadly 24 hours a day, when the first only is deadly when in confrontation.
Xzins just said that on another thread. Meaning Romney is not better than 0bummer.
I don’t agree, then, much as I love xzins (haven’t read his comment).
Now, you have to understand, “better than Obama” is to me a VERY relative statement. It’s like saying “Well, liver is better than squash,” when to me almost any food is better than squash.
I don’t want Romney to be the nominee. I really REALLY don’t want Romney to be the nominee.
But I think that anyone who says that, at the very worst possible interpretation, Romney wouldn’t do SOME degree of SOME percentage of what we want, while Obama does ZERO degree of ANYTHING we want, just isn’t being honest or isn’t paying attention.
Conservatives need to learn that “better” is better, even if it’s .001 degree better.
HSAT, I pray God that this whole discussion ends up being academic.