I wish someone would pursue the strange case of his social security number instead. The fact that the particular series of numbers are reserved for Connecticut residents has more intrigue and potential scandal than the debatable birth certificate IMO.
Orly Taitz was pursuing that but I haven’t read any updates for a while.
Go read: http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.146770/gov.uscourts.dcd.146770.39.0.pdf
Note the footnote:
“The Court is loath to dignify plaintiff’s allegations of fraud with a response on the merits. However, suffice it to say that plaintiff’s argument is premised on the incorrect assumption that Social Security numbers assigned prior to 1973 have any correlation to the recipient’s residence, see Employer Filing Instructions and Information, http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/stateweb.htm (“Prior to 1973, social security numbers were assigned by our field offices. The [first three] number[s] merely established that his/her card was issued by one of our offices in that State.”). Plaintiff’s entire premise is totally defeated by a cursory examination of this site, which demonstrates that plaintiff’s allegations lack any basis in fact.”