Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
That would only make sense if Lehman was betting against themselves.

Lehman was basically filing a claim on the "derivitive insurance agreement" so Lehman could collect enough money to pay its demand requirements. It was the law of the jungle of Sept 16 and Lehmans was only concerned with Lehmans. What is Insurance if it is not a contract to protect against an adverse outcome of yourself. Homeowners,collision, life insuance....all are cased when something bad happens to you.

25 posted on 10/22/2011 1:39:04 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (I ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Songwriter
Lehman was basically filing a claim on the "derivitive insurance agreement"

What Lehman "derivative insurance agreement" do you imagine Lehman owned that would allow them to claim money from AIG? Be specific.

What is Insurance if it is not a contract to protect against an adverse outcome of yourself.

You could buy a contract that pays off when Lehman defaults on their debt. Is that what you think Lehman bought? A contract that pays off when Lehman defaults?

27 posted on 10/22/2011 2:08:13 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson