PING
Not very likely it would be Perry going after Cain, Perry is pretty far down in the pack, it’s far more likely that it would be Romney and blaming Perry. Two hits with only one punch.
After reading the posted material, my wondering thought was, who is hitting whom?
Was their actually a directive that had been discovered to destroy someone? Or is there simply a headline that sounded like such was the case, so that impression would be made. After awhile, the head spins.
The headline maker wants to make someone look bad based on their suppositions and wording, that the someone is guilty of trying to make another person look bad. But in truth, that should make the one look bad who was allegedly trying to make another
person look bad for supposedly making someone look bad.
I got a headache and left the thread so I can go to work and not wonder about this while I’m working...