I’m sorry, but two wrongs do not make a right. I could not and will not vote for a ticket that has anyone on it that is not Constitutional eligible.
The 12th amendment says that you can’t be vice-president
if you are not eligable to be president.
If Obama can sit in the White House, fine he can sit in the White House, many people can sit in the White House. That does not make them president. Obama was not qualified to serve as president and is not now president nor will he ever be president. Having been sworn in, living in the White House and being addressed as MR President by numerous fools is immaterial. He does not qualify, there for he is not President.
My oldest brother was born to an underage american woman, he was killed in action in WWII, you take your underage BS and stick it where the sun don’t shine.
” If Obama can sit in the White House, I see no problem with Rubio.”
Which is exactly the reason people challenge Obama on his eliginility......Neither man meets the Constitutional requirements for the Presidency......
Tit for tat reasoning is no reason at all. At this point removal of Obama on constitutional grounds would be difficult approaching impossible. My hope is that the USSC will, upon Obama’s departure, rule on this matter.....You can be sure that id either Jindal or Rubio announce their candidacy the Democrats will challenge them on Constitutional grounds.....just as they did with McCain in the Senate.
” Obama’s mother was underage when Barry was born.”
That is only relevant if Obama was born overseas. If born in Hawaii, assumed as per the Obama life story narrative, the age of the mother is immaterial.