From straw man to ad hominem in one easy move! Bravo!
I have a theory that you can track who is winning an argument by what level of argument they pitch. The further down the scale of reason they go, the deeper hole they are in. What do you think?
Since you’ve demonstrated an inadequate level of reason to understand the nature of Moody’s business which I’ve tried to explain and still cling to your emotional response to your uninformed perception, I’ll leave it to you to determine how that fits into you argument scale theorem.