Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Legalizes Horse Slaughter for Human Consumption
technorati.com ^ | November 28, 2011 at 2:52 pm | Madeline Bernstein

Posted on 11/30/2011 7:33:57 AM PST by justlittleoleme

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: stars & stripes forever
Who would want to eat a horse?

Because when it's properly prepared it's quite tasty.

82 posted on 11/30/2011 10:15:10 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

>>House Republicans voted 217 to 19 in favor of this bill.<<

As they should have. The laws on eating horse meat haven’t changed, and are state-regulated. Here’s what happened (from a news article):

“Slaughter opponents pushed a measure cutting off funding for horse meat inspections through Congress in 2006 after other efforts to pass outright bans on horse slaughter failed in previous years. Congress lifted the ban in a spending bill President Barack Obama signed into law Nov. 18...”

All the 2006 action did is cost U.S. jobs, increase shipping of unwanted horses to Mexico and Canada for slaughter there, and reduce the incentive to dispose of an unwanted animal humanely, instead of just letting it starve in a barn, or turning it loose in wilder areas.

I know a guy who used to visit a lot of farms. When he caught someone cussing out his horse (happens a lot) he’d make them an offer. If accepted, every single one of the horses he bought went to a Midwest slaughterhouse within a week.

Farmer got paid to get rid of his problem, the guy in the middle made a tidy profit, the guy at the slaughterhouse got paid for his work or investment, the Canadians got another shipment of a desired food (to them) from the U.S., and the horse was no longer subjected to abuse, along with the possibility of being slowly starved to death in a cold winter.

In other words, left alone, or regulated lightly, markets do work. We keep forgetting that.

(And anyone who thinks those horses should have been “placed” in a better home had better be willing to sign up as a foster home for unwanted horses...you’ll be plenty busy...and quickly run out of money.)


83 posted on 11/30/2011 10:22:28 AM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc

When I glanced at your name, I misread it as “chefqc.” Thought you would be the perfect person to prepare a dish of “horse’s derrière en croute.”


84 posted on 11/30/2011 10:25:16 AM PST by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

Dunno. I suspect horses are bit tough and not as tasty as beef - little or no marbling.


85 posted on 11/30/2011 10:27:03 AM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

So little facts, so much rhetoric.

First of all, “Obama” didn’t do this, the federal government did it — it’s a law passed and signed.

Second of all, I don’t believe it’s for consumption in America — the meat is to be exported. For some reason, the federal government doesn’t think Americans have the right to choose what they eat, even when it is approved for human consumption.

Our local Democratic idiot Jim Moran is fighting this bill. His argument is that HE doesn’t want to eat horse meat, so nobody should be allowed to eat it. Also that since the meat is for other countries, he doesn’t think American taxpayers should have to foot the bill for the regulatory agency’s horse meat inspection process.

So you see, there are dying horses. They could be put humanely to sleep, and turned into food for other countries, adding to our exports. But our government is so over-regulated that you need a federal law to do this, and a federal regulatory agency to inspect it, and because some congressman doesn’t want to eat horse meat, he thinks nobody in the world should be allowed to eat a horse from america.

BTW, I believe it was still legal to ship horses to other countries, where they would be slaughtered and processed. So really we were just creating American manufacturing jobs here. But some democratic congressman doesn’t like that.


86 posted on 11/30/2011 10:42:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

“Who would want to eat a horse?”

I understand horsemeat is consumed in France. It was eaten in Scandinavia in the Dark Ages. It was banned from most of Chrisendom around 1000 AD because of its association with pagan ritual feasts, and also because of the rise of feudal cavalry (Chivalry, y’know). It wasn’t too long ago that my horse owning friends were complaining that prices at the horse auctions were going up because of purchases for the European horsemeat market; it was getting cheaper to eat a horse than to ride one.


87 posted on 11/30/2011 10:43:41 AM PST by VietVet (I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

Yes, but they should be killed humanly.


88 posted on 11/30/2011 11:18:55 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
They could be put humanely to sleep,

That is the key point-are they?

89 posted on 11/30/2011 11:22:10 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: USMCPOP

Obama Steaks? I think Omaha Steaks may have a copyright infringement case.


90 posted on 11/30/2011 2:49:38 PM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

Exactly. Also, states are still free to ban it completely if they wish.


91 posted on 11/30/2011 6:08:15 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

Yeah, but your chilluns probably can’t take it in their lunch to school either. Food police and all.


92 posted on 11/30/2011 8:35:23 PM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson