GOP Presidential Candidate Announces Support Of Gay Marriage

The Examiner ^ | 12/2/11 | Karl Dickey

[DJ MacWoW]

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

[LearsFool]

So keeping society’s marriage laws the same as they’ve been throughout the life of this country “makes government grow”? How exactly does that work again?

Did you join FR two weeks ago just to advance your anti-marriage agenda?

[rhombus]

No more governmnet.

[DJ MacWoW]

It’s government that pushing it. Didn’t read the quotes? Are you that politically deaf?

[rhombus]

And I’m not in favor. Are you making assumptions?

[DJ MacWoW]

Are you trying to redirect?

Did you read the quotes and understand them?

Do you understand that it is the MARXISTS in GOVERNMENT that is pushing deviancy because they DID read the quotes and they DO "get it"? And Stalin, Gramsci and Alinsky are their teachers?

[rhombus]

I got married in a church. Why government permission is wanted by anyone is beyond me. So as I said, I'm against anyone in gov or out of gov pushing more licenses from gov. Don't know how to make it any more clear for you or what it is you're objecting to.

[DJ MacWoW]

My "objection" is your What do I care?

You were given quotes to explain why you should care.

So your approach seems to be the "ostrich strategy". You'll fight marxiam in government by ignoring what they are doing. And you think that's a winning strategy?

[rhombus]

So tell me, how are you going to use gov’t to solve this problem?

[DJ MacWoW]

Quote where I said that I was.

[rhombus]

Ding! Ding! Ding! Then we have agreement.

[DJ MacWoW]

No. We don't.

I care. You hide which is typical for a liberaltarian.

Don't get sand in your ears. Buh bye!

[rhombus]

Since we’re sharing (yuch) ;-) My impression is that you draw conclusions on limited data sets. This is sometimes dangersous and sometimes embarassing. C ya.

[trisham]

He’s gone.

[DJ MacWoW]

His fellow “I don’t care liberaltarian” will be deeply saddened.

[trisham]

I wonder how many who claim to be libertarians know much of anything about it? From Wikipedia:

Libertarian schools of thought differ over the degree to which the state should be reduced.

Anarchists advocate complete elimination of the state. Minarchists advocate a state which is limited to protecting its citizens from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud.

Some libertarians go further, such as by supporting minimal public assistance for the poor.[4] Additionally, some schools are supportive of private property rights in the ownership of unappropriated land and natural resources while others reject such private ownership and often support common ownership instead.[5][6][7]

Another distinction can be made among libertarians who support private ownership and those that support common ownership of the means of production; the former generally supporting a capitalist economy, the latter a libertarian socialist economic system.

In some parts of the world, the term "libertarianism" is synonymous with Left anarchism.[8]

[DJ MacWoW]

Well I’ve never met a liberaltarian that actually cared about the breakdown of society nor the Founders intent. Every single one has had the political philosophy of “If it feels good, do it” which is a lefty 60’s POV.

[Arrowhead1952]

I figured this one wouldn't last long.

[50mm]

Retread Retro Llama bought it on this thread:

Retro gets the ZOT

Check out the new and improved thread title.

[BigSkyFreeper]

Gary Johnson is an Occupy Wall Street clown with a suit.