To: shield
Hey, I would rather vote for Newt than Mitt (Such a dilemma is akin to saying I would rather eat a one inch long dog turd instead of a two inch long dog turd).
But Newt knew the deadlines and so did the rest of the candidates. If they don't qualify then tough toenails. Either follow the fricking rules or get out of the game.
18 posted on
12/24/2011 8:36:53 AM PST by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: Mad Dawgg
>> If they don’t qualify then tough toenails. Either follow the fricking rules or get out of the game. >>
True conservatives will readily question burdensome bureacratic “rules” that are based on central control and reducing opportunity.
Liberals and shallow thinkers will hide behind “rules are rules” thinking even when the rules are idiotic and made simply to advantage life long Presidential candidates.
I guess you just happily and proudly lumped yourself in with liberals and shallow thinkers.
To: Mad Dawgg
Hey, I would rather vote for Newt than Mitt (Such a dilemma is akin to saying I would rather eat a one inch long dog turd instead of a two inch long dog turd). Great analogy. I agree with it.
59 posted on
12/24/2011 9:04:28 AM PST by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: Mad Dawgg
“Hey, I would rather vote for Newt than Mitt (Such a dilemma is akin to saying I would rather eat a one inch long dog turd instead of a two inch long dog turd).”
I couldn't have done a better job of expressing how I fell about the two “front-runners.” Thanks!
103 posted on
12/24/2011 9:35:41 AM PST by
bwc2221
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson