7 REASONS WHY MITT ROMNEY'S ELECTABILITY IS A MYTH

TownHall.com ^ | Dec 27, 2011 | John Hawkins

[ClarenceThomasfan]

I am not voting for Romney either. If worst come to worst - we have a chance at getting a real conservative in there in four years rather than waiting for eight years if Romney gets in there.

It’s not to late - nominate a conservative and we won’t have to re-elect Obama.

[sodpoodle]

****That’s not “the free market system”. It’s the insider “manipulated market system”.****

Beware: From a distance a vulture may appear as an eagle.

[lentulusgracchus]

(Article) ......Mitt Romney, ... has proven to be a pasty, grey pile of formless mush.

Well, that's fine, but what do you really think? .... LOL

[lentulusgracchus]

That’s not “the free market system”. It’s the insider “manipulated market system”.

It's the kind of thing Jay Gould used to do ... and Ken Lay .... and both were reviled by the real marketarians of their respective generations.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

bfl

[af_vet_rr]

2)The Mormon thing. Bias against Mormons exists.

Bias against the Mormon church. Plenty of Mormons are good folks, but the Mormon church...

[Yosemitest]

"they would vote for Romney to save our country from another four years of Obama.
You have to know that a write in is just another vote for Obama"

You have to know that a vote for Romney is exactly what "Establishment Republicans" are counting on.
"Establishment Republicans" are the enemy!!!
"Establishment Republicans" ENABLE Democrats Communists to CONTINUE their march towards Fabian Socialism.
I refer you back to post #6 so you can re-read

A Fabian Socialist Dream Come True,
The gradual revolution of the Fabian Socialists is quickly becoming a reality in America.

Let me remind you:

"You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept Communism outright.
But we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism
until you finally wake up and realize you already have communism.
We won’t have to fight you;
we’ll so weaken your economy
that you will fall like over ripe fruit into our hands. "


Nikita Kruschev, Former Soviet Premier

---

How much longer will you allow these "Establishment Republicans" that suck our life blood out of "Liberty" to USE AND ABUSE YOU ?
When will you wake up and smell the coffee, and show these stinking "Establishment Republicans" that "WE MEAN WHAT WE SAY" ?
Like I've posted so many times before:

A Tea Partier who refrains from voting for a Republican candidate who shares few if any of his beliefs
can no more be accused of holding out for an ideal candidate
than can someone who refuses to marry a person with whom he has little to anything in common
be accused of holding out for an ideal spouse.
In other words, the object of the argument against purism is the most glaring of straw men:
“I will not vote for a thoroughly flawed candidate” is one thing;
“I will only vote for a perfect candidate” is something else entirely.



As for the second objection against the Tea Partier’s rejection of those Republican candidates who eschew his values and convictions,
it can be dispensed with just as effortlessly as the first.

Every election season—and at no time more so than this past season—Republicans pledge to “reform Washington,” “trim down” the federal government, and so forth.
Once, however, they get elected and they conduct themselves with none of the confidence and enthusiasm with which they expressed themselves on the campaign trail,
those who placed them in office are treated to one lecture after the other on the need for “compromise” and “patience.”

Well, when the Tea Partier’s impatience with establishment Republican candidates intimates a Democratic victory,
he can use this same line of reasoning against his Republican critics.
My dislike for the Democratic Party is second to none, he can insist.
But in order to advance in the long run my conservative or Constitutionalist values, it may be necessary to compromise some in the short term.

For example,

as Glenn Beck once correctly noted in an interview with Katie Couric,
had John McCain been elected in 2008, it is not at all improbable that, in the final analysis,
the country would have been worse off than it is under a President Obama.
McCain would have furthered the country’s leftward drift,
but because this movement would have been slower,
and because McCain is a Republican, it is not likely that the apparent awakening that occurred under Obama would have occurred under McCain.

It may be worth it, the Tea Partier can tell Republicans, for the GOP to lose some elections if it means that conservatives—and the country—will ultimately win.

If he didn’t know it before, the Tea Partier now knows that accepting short-term loss in exchange for long-term gain is the essence of compromise, the essence of politics.

Ironically, he can thank the Republican for impressing this so indelibly upon him.

No, I will NOT vote for Romney!!!/font

[Elsie]

This is a baffling argument because many people just seem to assume it's true, despite the plethora of evidence to the contrary.

HMMmmm...

Sounds just like MORMONism.

[Elsie]

2)The Mormon thing. Bias against Mormons exists.

That's what MORMONism likes to SHOUT; but the BIAS is 'against' the ISM!

MORMONs are the ones DECEIVED by MORMONism!

[Elsie]

2)The Mormon thing. Bias against Mormons exists.

That's what MORMONism likes to SHOUT; but the BIAS is 'against' the ISM!

MORMONs are the ones DECEIVED by MORMONism!

---

As a sixth-generation member of , Romney is descended from a genealogically interconnected sometimes known as the .

 

 

[Elsie]

The love don't fit!

I'll MAKE it fit!!

[Elsie]

Beware: From a distance a vulture may appear as an eagle.

[Elsie]

Plenty of Mormons are good folks, but the Mormon church... HERESY.

[Elsie]

(That didn't come out right)

---

As a sixth-generation member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,

 Romney is descended from a genealogically interconnected political family sometimes known as the Pratt–Romneys.

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willard_mitt_romney

[radioone]

Just imagine......McConnell, Boehner and Romney as the leadership of the Party. Somehow, I’m not instilled with the thought that this team could stop the “runaway train” Obama has started.

[Elsie]

[Elsie]

Mormon Archeology...  http://mormonsites.org/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Impy]

I think being boring could actually be a plus for him electorally speaking. Boring seems safe and steady compared to President O-Hype and other personality driven candidates.

[Elsie]

Meanwhile; back at the Word of Wisdom...

[neverdem]

Shocker. Obama’s Top Political Advisor Directly Linked to Occupy Wall Street Protests

Put yourself in the White House. Romney is their perfect opponent for their class warfare campaign in the general election, plus Romney can't generate much or any enthusiasm from the GOP's base.