Romney can not win in the South. Mark it down. Gingrich will be the nominee. Good ole boys are not easily fooled by a pro-abortion, pro-homo marriage liberal. The ONLY REASON this sleeze Romney is ahead in the Iowa polls is because he and old man Paul teamed up to destroy Newt’s chances with millions and millions of dollars worth of lying azz negative campaign ads. No doubt in my mind that the sleezy Romney has promised Paul a high cabinet position if he’s the nominee. Probably budget director or sec of the treasury. Gingrich would not give Paul the time of day. Paul also does not play well in SC. The dingbat, lying Bachmann has also been promised something from Romney. She only attacks Gingrich, never saying hardly anything negative about the liberal Romney. Anyone heard “Mrs tradional marriage” call out Romney on his support of homo marriage? Absolutely not. She’s a joke.
But....look at it this way.
Regardless of who emerges victorious from the right, the stain has the following blocks sewn up tight:
1. blacks (inner city, unemployed, welfare recipients, etc),
2. whites (unemployed and on benefits, underemployed, dispossesed, debt ridden, jobless/hopeless, etc),
3. illegals (yes - they do vote. Yes - illegally, but who's stopping them?),
4. Socialists/commmunists/marxists and educators (professors, teachers),
5. Unions, and
6. hispanics.
The one voting block that will not do much this time around is/are "yutes"; they simply will stay away in droves.
Moreover, regardless of who emerges victorious from the intercene warfare on the right, no one on the left is going to change their minds and "switch" votes.
"Independents"??? Nah. After watching what was left of their country after Bush got done with it deteriorate almost to the point of "terminal" - they're minds are made up as well. There is nothing "the right" can do or say at this point that will "swing" any significant amount of votes one way or the other.
IMHO....the dye is cast.