Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why 80% Reject Paul and Romney
Townhall ^ | January 1, 2012 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 01/01/2012 10:59:11 AM PST by greyfoxx39

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: greyfoxx39

Good question. Force feeding RINOs down our throat only results in vomitus.


21 posted on 01/01/2012 12:24:54 PM PST by catfish1957 (Save a Pretzel for the Gas Jets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey; Jim Robinson
Sometimes you have to go with someone who doesn’t agree with you one hundred per cent, but it’s better than staying home and watching Obama steal another election.

That is a deceptive rationale because 100 percent of the time, Romney opposes the principles of limited government conservatism:

1. Vote against Obama by all means, but if you vote FOR Romney, you are voting FOR making the Republican Party the party of keeping abortion legal on the FEDERAL level and, if his RomneyCare in Mass. is the standard, making YOU and ME pay for the at-will murder of the unborn.

2. Vote against Obama by all means, but if you vote FOR Romney, you are voting FOR making the Republican Party the party of embracing save-the-planetism, global warming, and the regulation by OTHER NATIONS of America's energy production and consumption (Quoth Romney, who believes global warming is happening and that man is at least partially to blame: "Any carbon plan has to be worldwide in scop. Let's have a worldwide solution, not an American one." -- CPAC speech, 2008).

3. Vote against Obama by all means, but if you vote FOR Romney, you are voting FOR making the Republican Party the party of forcing American culture, including its military, to EMBRACE open homosexuality in virtually every aspect of life, and PUNISHING people when they peacefully reject, by discriminating against, open homosexuality in their workplaces, their childrens's schools and youth groups, their business choices, their neighborhoods, and their military ranks. Understand that no rights are bestowed -- "gay rights" is all about DENYING Americans their God-given right to reject open homosexuality in their personal and public lives.

4. Vote against Obama by all means, but if you vote FOR Romney, you are voting FOR making the Republican Party the party of the appointment of activist liberal judges to the Supreme Court. Romney has a track record of piss-poor judge picks, and it is because CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLE SAILS OVER HIS HEAD.

5. Vote against Obama by all means, but if you vote FOR Romney, you are voting FOR making the Republican Party the party of more and bigger governnment, increased statism, and heavier government tyranny.

When you vote FOR Romney, Obama has zero to do with anything, because you will be voting to increase liberalism in both political parties. You will be voting to allow statism and government tyranny to STEAL our nation under the Republican banner!

Obama we can fight. Romney ties our hands behind our backs. ROMNEY NEEDS TO LOSE.

22 posted on 01/01/2012 12:36:07 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hershey

DO NOT PUSH ROMNEY ON THIS PRO-LIFE SITE!!


23 posted on 01/01/2012 12:40:04 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

24 posted on 01/01/2012 12:49:46 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

A search like this?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?s=paul+and+romney&ok=Search&q=quick&m=exact&o=time


25 posted on 01/01/2012 1:06:15 PM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

I am voting for Rick Perry. Enough said.


26 posted on 01/01/2012 1:07:28 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

27 posted on 01/01/2012 1:38:34 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

The Paul voters who are independents or Democrats should not be included in the polling. These people are hijacking the Republican nomination process. No more open primaries!


28 posted on 01/01/2012 1:55:11 PM PST by Socon-Econ (Socon-Econ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I searched the title of the article, in the manner in which it was named...”Why 80% Reject Paul and Romney”...why is this your concern? Are you the new FR posting czar? If so, you will be very busy as there are duplicate threads posted quite often. In any case, get off my back!


29 posted on 01/01/2012 2:23:02 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (The Iowa caucuses gave you Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama. You're WELCOME, America.-Iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Finny
When you vote FOR Romney, Obama has zero to do with anything, because you will be voting to increase liberalism in both political parties. You will be voting to allow statism and government tyranny to STEAL our nation under the Republican banner!

Obama we can fight. Romney ties our hands behind our backs. ROMNEY NEEDS TO LOSE.

Excellent post. Bears repeating.

30 posted on 01/01/2012 2:26:30 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (The Iowa caucuses gave you Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama. You're WELCOME, America.-Iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

This is the most condescending piece of tripe I’ve read on this matter yet. Does the author actually think that Iowans are not evaluating the candidates with their very own brain cells and reaching their very own conclusions?

I tell you, I am sick to death of any statement of support for a candidate, or any non-negative analysis of that candidate, being perceived emotionally as someone “telling you what to think.”

Good grief.

Can we move beyond the psychobabble and simply state the case for or against a candidate, without framing it as those who may disagree with your analysis are duped, mind-numbed robots? Thank you.


31 posted on 01/01/2012 2:30:16 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG; Jim Robinson
Can we move beyond the psychobabble and simply state the case for or against a candidate, without framing it as those who may disagree with your analysis are duped, mind-numbed robots?

IMO, and that of the owner of FR, anyone who supports Romney and/or Paul IS a mind-numbed robot.

I think the author makes a lot of sense.

32 posted on 01/01/2012 2:36:51 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (The Iowa caucuses gave you Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama. You're WELCOME, America.-Iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks greyfoxx39.


33 posted on 01/01/2012 2:55:12 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
People reject the notion of anarchy without looking at the definition. It means "without a ruler".

Frequently, that doesn't sound bad to me.

34 posted on 01/01/2012 3:14:44 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

One is plastic—say anything to get elected sort of rich guy who thinks he can buy the office, the other guy is a nut—a libertarian who would be as bad as a liberal imposing his way of thinking on the rest of us.


35 posted on 01/01/2012 5:42:18 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Sometimes you have to go with someone who doesn’t agree with you one hundred per cent, but it’s better than staying home and watching Obama steal another election.

“The other guy is driving us towards the cliff at 100 mph” is not a reason to vote for a guy who will drive us towards the cliff at a mere 80 mph.

36 posted on 01/01/2012 5:54:43 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Virginia GOP: Romney's favorite butt boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Why in the world are you running to JimRob for a pat on the head because of my comment?

Good grief, first off, I did not say anything about supporting Romney.

Secondly, my entire post was a comment on the ridiculous analytical framework of the article and the condescension involved in claiming that people with whom one disagrees are not thinking for themselves.

You, obviously, think otherwise. And you seem perfectly comfortable with the delusion that the only reason someone might disagree with you on who is the best candidate is that they are mind-numbed robots.

Sorry. I recognize and accept that most people are able to think for themselves and do. I don't need a bunch of psychobabble hooey to help me deal with the fact that people disagree with me sometimes. I don't condescend to people who reach different conclusions from me. I accept that they have their reasons and, if I am so inclined, I engage those reasons and set out countervailing arguments.

But to write an article about how a whole state is full of people unwilling to think for themselves — as “evidenced” by the fact that people are not supporting “your” candidate — is, in my view, a wagonload of lamentable tripe.

But suit yourself.

37 posted on 01/01/2012 6:04:39 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; greyfoxx39
"911 operator. What is the nature of your emergency?"

Upchuck: "Someone posted a duplicate thread on Free Republic!!!"

38 posted on 01/01/2012 7:21:48 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

LOL


39 posted on 01/01/2012 7:30:39 PM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG; Jim Robinson
"a wagonload of lamentable tripe" is your arrogant reply to me. Oh, did I mention "condescending"? You are the one who called folks "mind-numbed robots, you obviously are ignorant of the FR custom of pinging a FReeper when he is mentioned in a post which is why JR was mentioned....{DARN, now I have to ping him again!)

"Why in the world are you running to JimRob for a pat on the head because of my comment?"

For some reason you seem to believe I wrote the article heading the thread, which I did not.

And you seem perfectly comfortable with the delusion that the only reason someone might disagree with you on ..anything....is that they are mind-numbed robots.

Quoting you again.."if I am so inclined, I engage those reasons and set out countervailing arguments."...full of hostility and "condescension".

But suit yourself.

40 posted on 01/01/2012 7:47:35 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (The Iowa caucuses gave you Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama. You're WELCOME, America.-Iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson