Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA
Santorum was foolish to try to discuss this in public.

He didn't. His wife, a nurse, wrote about it in a book. The Santorums are sturdy defenders of life. They have every right to give their testimony of how they valued that child, and resisted letting some institution carry away the corpse to be tossed in an incinerator. No doubt they wanted to examine the child, see who he resembled, and give his body a testament of love and caring with their eyes, arms and hands. If you think the child's soul and the angels were not watching, think again.

67 posted on 01/03/2012 11:16:22 AM PST by Albion Wilde (A land of hyper-legalisms is not the same as a land of law. --Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Albion Wilde

Ann Coulter on radio now talking about this. Comparing it to Hillary crying about how important this all is, and then winning the NH primary. Sheesh. But she does admit that Santorum did not bring this up.


71 posted on 01/03/2012 11:22:27 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Albion Wilde

I can’t believe she wrote about this without his knowledge and approval.

When you put intimate and personal details of your life into the public domain then you give up the right to be offend when people discuss it in public.

What I would criticize Colmes for is characterize what they did as “playing with” their dead baby. That was scummy and reprehensible.

I completely understand why some people would consider this episode creepy and I would not criticize anyone for saying so.


79 posted on 01/03/2012 11:53:04 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson