1 posted on
01/04/2012 6:12:24 PM PST by
tobyhill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: tobyhill
To: tobyhill
3 posted on
01/04/2012 6:19:14 PM PST by
Colonial Warrior
(Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction.)
To: tobyhill
"adj. murk·i·er also mirk·i·er, murk·i·est also mirk·i·est. 1. Dark, dim, or gloomy: a murky dungeon. See Synonyms at dark. 2. a. Heavy and thick with smoke, mist, ..." www.thefreedictionary.com/murky
4 posted on
01/04/2012 6:19:52 PM PST by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: tobyhill
Nobody knows. You lie, Politico.
5 posted on
01/04/2012 6:21:52 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: tobyhill
It’s a shame none of the Rs in DC have the cojones to ram this right into federal court and give Obama one more thing to have to defend himself against.
6 posted on
01/04/2012 6:22:20 PM PST by
bigbob
To: tobyhill
Better be front and center on the debates...yea I know....I can dream.
But RS and Newt really better run with it hard and fast. It’s a gift. A gateway to get by all his other media coverups with the racism charge. Because there is no presidence.
7 posted on
01/04/2012 6:23:01 PM PST by
Norm Lenhart
(Curse you, Norm Lenhart! Im slain, crumpled in a ditch by your obvious superiority - Humblegunner)
To: tobyhill
The senate has the power to take action to fix this, but of course, won't, because liberals control the chamber. The house could take action, but any action would be described by the press as just being politics...
So what's left is private citizens taking action in the courts, who will most likely shrug their shoulders and point at the senate and the house as the places to have this settled, as they have mechanisms for keeping the president from overstepping his bounds.
The whole dog and pony show over who's running for president (or in Obama’s case, present) means nothing compared to taking back the people's house from the liberals, both in and out of the GOP.
9 posted on
01/04/2012 6:23:31 PM PST by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: tobyhill
Why are they calling it a "recess" appointment?! It is not a "recess" appointment. It would be a recess appointment if the Senate was actually in recess. However, they are not in recess.
12 posted on
01/04/2012 6:26:39 PM PST by
Moorings
To: tobyhill
Impeachment time for this arse.
13 posted on
01/04/2012 6:30:28 PM PST by
Joe Bfstplk
(People should enjoy the fruits of their labor. No labor, no fruit.)
To: tobyhill
Radio talk show host Mark Levin was quite clear on this issue - it was illegal since the House was still in session and the Senate cannot adjourn without the consent of the House and vis-versa.
The “Communist In Chief” just came out of the red closet, not only on this Constitution-ignoring act, an impeachable act, but also in his Shaker Heights Cleveland high school speech where he talk the students (these blithering ignorant assholes), that he would do want he wanted to and ignore the expressed limits that the Constitution places on an imperial presidency re the rights of the Congress.
(Again, hattip to Levin for playing some of this speech).
Did you know that the last “O” in Politico stood for “Uh Oh, we screwed up again with our ignorance of the Constitution”?
IT IS TIME TO FORM A NATIONAL “IMPEACH OBAMA COMMITTEE”. He has shredded the Constitution or corrupted it, aided and abetted by the marxists and crooks he has appointed.
Time to change the national slogan from “Hail to the Chief” to “Jail to the Theft” (he is stealing our freedom).
It is time that loyal Americans stood up and said “No More”.
To: tobyhill; All
Murky?!Such "journalism" is proof POSITIVE the media--local, national, and 'net-based are eager to fellate Hussein!
Can you imagine if Bush did this what the headline would say? Would it say Bush's authority was MURKY? Hell, no. The headlines ALL would talk about Bush's abrogation of precedent, the Constitutional crisis he was creating for political gain, and the PROBLEM with executives who overreach their authority.
Not with Hussein.
Dammit, folks, we have to not only beat this assclown in November, we need to begin to change the CULTURE in news media. Teach kids the truth, and encourage them to infiltrate these industries.
To: All
Note how Politico admits that the Senate is not in recess but that Obama’s appointment is “murky” despite the fact that the Constitution clearly states that he can't appoint unless they are on recess but then try to justify Obama’s move by claiming Bush made recess appointments when congress was in recess.
18 posted on
01/04/2012 6:38:50 PM PST by
tobyhill
(Obama, The Biggest Thief In American History)
To: tobyhill
I think this is just the beginning, obumber is pushing for a fight. He will only become more aggressive until he gets his fight. That is his whole reelection strategy. Boner is in a bad place because he has been weak all along. Nothing he can do now, it’s lose-lose situation for the republicans. obumber has the media and apparently some balls, the gop has boner and mcConel. We are screwed!
19 posted on
01/04/2012 6:39:01 PM PST by
JoSixChip
(Top 10% of wage earners pay 70% of total income taxes collected. Bottom 50% pay less then 3%, fair?)
To: tobyhill
Obama recess appointment power is murky (It's not "murky", it's Unconstitutional)
Especially when the power is to fill a vacancy that occurs during the Senate's recess, not one that the President has failed to fill prior to the recess because he was too chicken (or something else more sinister) to deal with the Senate.
20 posted on
01/04/2012 6:40:13 PM PST by
aruanan
To: All; tobyhill
This is a constitutional crisis and deliberately so.
21 posted on
01/04/2012 6:46:38 PM PST by
newzjunkey
(Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
To: tobyhill
So who’s going to stop him?
Thought so.
Go pay your taxes - your government is broke.
/sarc(???)
23 posted on
01/04/2012 6:48:16 PM PST by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
To: tobyhill
When even Politico sees muddy water, B.O.'s sitting neck-deep in an unsavory pile. Sooner or later, the other shoe has
got to drop on this subversive POS and his apparatchiks.
"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."
24 posted on
01/04/2012 6:48:16 PM PST by
Viking2002
(My regular avatar has resumed from the holiday festivities, But is not yet sober. And it's armed.)
To: tobyhill
25 posted on
01/04/2012 6:49:42 PM PST by
GOP Poet
(Time for Bambi and his commie crew to go.)
To: tobyhill
26 posted on
01/04/2012 6:49:42 PM PST by
GOP Poet
(Time for Bambi and his commie crew to go.)
To: tobyhill
Bummer’s got corporate America on his case now. This can’t be all bad though the rhetoric that will arise from the White Hut end will be rich.
29 posted on
01/04/2012 6:50:56 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson