Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fight_truth_decay

The court returned our docs because they said all petitioners had the same address...so they rejected to post our filing. Pamela Barnett heatedly told them she was going to file an ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT because there was no such LAW. It was merely a bogus decision on the Sacramento Court Clerks part. They quickly recounted and told us to REFILE and they would back-date the paperwork back to the original filing date. I can assure you we came away mumbling about the incompetence of the Sac Superior Court! Hence, the “date mumbo-jumbo.”


8 posted on 01/21/2012 9:34:30 AM PST by ednoonan7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ednoonan7

Thanks for the information...Keep up the good work!


9 posted on 01/21/2012 1:54:03 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson