Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CedarDave

This comes through in the debates. Everything is thrown at Newt and he finds a way to retort whereas it’s clear Romney can be thrown off. He gets nervous in manner and stumbles for words. The tax return question last night was one of those times. He likes preplanned talking points.


15 posted on 01/20/2012 6:05:51 PM PST by newzjunkey (SC: a vote for Santorum or Paul is a vote for Romney's coronation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

Problem is if you’re not honest, you have to double check everything you say to make sure it isn’t inconsistent with other dishonest statements you’ve made before. That’s something very hard to do unless you’re smart as Clinton, and eventually even people as good at it as him fall off the tightrope (”is is”).


16 posted on 01/20/2012 6:14:56 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey; Jim Robinson

Listening to a repeat of Laura Ingraham on WBAP. She predicts that when Santorum is ready to concede, he will support Romney, which is to me inconceivable given with Rick’s position on social issues. Like most establishment “conservatives” in DC, she’s in the tank for Romney. How a very pro-life Catholic could support Mitt is beyond me; maybe she cannot believe Newt has changed or maybe she just is one of those women who cannot look past his former transgressions.


19 posted on 01/20/2012 6:38:51 PM PST by CedarDave (Donna Brazile: "... we we believe that the weakest candidate ... [is] Mitt Romney.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson