Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2012 11:06:27 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

He could reduce costs by eliminating “Dork-O-Matic” majors -like the one he undoubtedly (purchased, cheated, quota-ed) himself into.


2 posted on 01/27/2012 11:09:02 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Interesting, considering, economically speaking, government subsidy and loan guarantees are the cause of the astronomical tuition for useless higher “education”.
4 posted on 01/27/2012 11:13:56 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What is preventing students and/or “Occupiers” from shopping around for the most affordable colleges right now?

Why do they think they need a new law?


5 posted on 01/27/2012 11:16:11 AM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25% MORE sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“Under the plan, colleges would be rewarded based on their success in offering relatively lower tuition prices, providing value and serving low-income students, the White House said.”

Sort of like imposing the ‘success’ of section 8 apartments to education.


6 posted on 01/27/2012 11:21:06 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“The plan would not cost taxpayers additional dollars because students pay off the aid money with interest, officials stressed.”

These kind of statements aren’t even remotely funny anymore. Where the h@ll does the money come from in the first place and where the h@ll are my dividends from the interest revenue?

-!


7 posted on 01/27/2012 11:21:15 AM PST by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“The plan would not cost taxpayers additional dollars because students pay off the aid money with interest, officials stressed”

If this were true, we wouldn’t need federal financial aid...students could all just go to a bank.


8 posted on 01/27/2012 11:25:13 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“The plan would not cost taxpayers additional dollars because students pay off the aid money with interest, officials stressed.”

Here is a 2010 report:

http://www.ifap.ed.gov/perkinscdrguide/attachments/0910PerkinsCDR.pdf

Of the 367,000 people who finished school and ‘entered repayment status’ in 2008-2009, 37,000, or a full 10 PERCENT were in default by June 2010!!

And out of all loan holders, almost half a million people are 240 days past due.


11 posted on 01/27/2012 11:32:47 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Gee do you think that big universities would be willing to give up their football and basketball programs so D average Larry Lowlife can afford tuition at their school? Part of Obama’s plan would be to guarantee college for everyone even those who are academically challenged. Kind of like giving a mortgage to those who cannot afford to pay it.
12 posted on 01/27/2012 11:43:32 AM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson