Posted on 01/30/2012 6:57:25 AM PST by marktwain
"The concept of a 'monopoly on force' might sound foreign or even frightening to Americans that take great pride in our revolutionary beginnings," Coalition to Stop Gun Violence Executive Director Josh Horwitz wrote in a Huffington Post citizen disarmament advocacy piece, "but it is the fundamental organizing principle of any political entity, including the United States."
“To back up this assertion,” I explained in a GUNS Magazine Rights Watch column, “he cites, ‘German political economist and sociologist Max Weber.’"
“What he doesn't cite,” I elaborated, “is Weber's support for approving Article 48 into the Weimar constitution, establishing "emergency powers" to bypass Reichstag consent, and allowing Adolf Hitler's rise to unchallenged power. Not to mention the attainment of a ‘monopoly of force,’ although Weber preferred the term ‘violence.’"
It’s no surprise someone representing an organization that changed its name from “The National Coalition to Ban Handguns” in order to mask its true intent would keep that bit of crucial information from his readers—after all, he must have boxes of books on the subject nobody’s buying or reading that he needs to unload. But those who agree with Horwitz’s historically insupportable, and frankly, loopy conclusion, that the freest and safest citizens are those who cede their primal rights to an all-powerful state monopoly, might be interested to learn that one of the “founding fathers” of modern “progressivism” came to the exact opposite conclusion.
I speak of “Robin Hood of the Law” Louis Brandeis, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court nominated to the high court by Woodrow Wilson, and a leading proponent of “progressive” causes in his day.
From The Volokh Conspiracy, author and attorney Dave Kopel shares an exchange between Brandeis and the United Kingdom’s Ambassador to the United States:
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
It is never about guns. It is always about control. Once disarmed, subjects are easy to control through a “monopoly of violence”.
In America, the People Are the State.
Only in that old relic, The Constitution. Since at least LBJ and maybe as far back as Wilson, the Government has assumed the role of sugar daddy in exchange for peoples freedom and most people are happy with the deal.
Most people ARE happy with a free lunch.
But a few hours later they are hungry again and there is no more free food.
Most people ARE happy with a free lunch.
But a few hours later they are hungry again and there is no more free food and the cost of the lunch is included in dinner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.