Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazlo in PA

Romney was exposed as to how shallow his message was and his lack of core beliefs by Newt’s ability to lift himself into the lead without money but with his message, abilities and capabilities. Romney then resorted to not just negative campaigning but to repeated lies and distortions and kept repeating them even after they were discredited and proven false, thus he exposed his true character or I should say lack of. The Rinos and media saw nothing wrong with negativity until Newt responded. And what did Dr.Paul have to gain by running negative and un-truthful ads againdt a candidate who was not in the lead? Why hasn’t Paul ever attacked Romney?


20 posted on 02/10/2012 8:49:54 AM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: duffee
Why hasn’t Paul ever attacked Romney?

I read a piece recently that Paul and Milt are close friends. Someone argued last night that Paul is the real stalking horse for Milt and that if the delegate count gets close, Paul will throw his to Milt in return for Rand being VP. Makes as much sense as anything on this weird relationship.

23 posted on 02/10/2012 8:55:30 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson