[DoughtyOne]

On the bright side, I don’t think they can destroy them by the end of the year. This guy has got to go. If not, the end is near, and I’m not really kidding.

[Steve Newton]

As I have commented before on this——It is treason. The first job of the POTUS is to protect this nation and its people.

THIS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.

[Venturer]

Insanity.

[Jerrybob]

White House drive for ‘nuclear zero’ imperils the world.

Everything this ZERO does imperils the world -- starting with the US of A....

[Chgogal]

Brilliant move President Dumba$$. Obviously, you would like to have one or two of our enemies attack us at the same time. Your open invitation to attack is crystal clear. It is that or you don't know how to play checkers (much less chess). The only people who are dumber and more evil than President Dumba$$ are the jerks who voted this Anti-American Marxist into office.

Hopefully a few per cent of these neanderthals will smarten up and vote the Anti-American Marxist out of office.

[Texas Fossil]

My father-in-law spent 40 years making those devices and now the Quisling Bastard wants to destroy all of them but 300.

FUBO! Quisling Bastard.

[familyop]

Our political class in action, keeping oil prices down and globalism going for today. One might wonder as to when Iran will have more nukes than our USA.

[Nip]

Peace through international treaty obligation.

I didn't have to think more than 30 seconds about this before I started uncontrollably laughing.

I direct the reader of this posting to all of the international arms limitation treaties immediately following the “War to end all wars” aka World War I.

The “Guns of August” had been silent for less than three years before a series of international conferences designed to limit the size (number of ships, weight of ships, a size of guns) of various navies. Remember during the first third of the 20th century a nation's power was measured by the size of its biggest and most visible WMD - the battleship (oh what a horrible name - BATTLEship /s/).

All total there were 5 such international arms limitation conferences 1921 - 1935, Washington, Geneva, and London.

They did a whole lot of good - 18 years after the first one Europe and then the World erupted in war, World War II. The total body count of that war far exceeded the first one even excluding the organized murder in both Germany and Russia.

Why haven't there been a similar world war circa 1963? or 1981? or 1999? Where there any more international piece conferences that were more effective than their predecessors? Did the human race get smarter?

No.

There was no world wide conflict for 55 years because there was a super power able and willing to enforce its ideals and it sure wasn't communist in nature.

When you go back to the 19th century (the 1800’s) there was even a longer period of world piece - a century's worth to be exact. This was also caused by the existence of a single super power that enforced its vision of peace.

So, what do I expect out this latest attempt at world peace through international agreements? FAILURE. Because it is being pushed by the One doesn't mean the nature of man has changed. But then telling the truth like this is no longer popular - “You can't say that”.

Well, “You can't say that” isn't going to stop a bullet much less the primary and secondary effects of a nuclear detonation.

[combat_boots]

I have had pacifist relatives. I would say my SIL is one. To think someone will not attack you if you do not defend yourself is illogical. To refuse to defend yourself when others are heavily armed is pathologically misogynistic.

Ancient Chinese wisdom: “Insult leads to injury.”