Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting, if accurate.
1 posted on 03/07/2012 6:27:25 AM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

She won’t sue. I hope she does! Then we’d get to ask her all kinds of questions during deposition and discovery. She’d be a slut under oath and in fear of perjury.


2 posted on 03/07/2012 6:31:30 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

I’d be highly surprised if this (a perceived weakness in Catholic resolve to oppose contraceptive coverage mandates) was NOT part of the reason. One strikes when the iron is hot, not when it is cold.


3 posted on 03/07/2012 6:32:33 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

As usual, the Dems will overplay this one...


5 posted on 03/07/2012 6:34:43 AM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
She's just marginally tied in to the Obot crowd. Remember, she was a "substitute" for the individual the Democrats wanted to have do the testifying in the Congressional committee.

She was obviously not well vetted. Her apparent occupation before coming to Georgetown was actually LOBBYING FOR THE SEX CHANGE INDUSTRY.

This is probably the first time that crowd has gotten anyone hooked into a mainstream Democrat initiative, but there you have it.

I'm not sure the Democrats can build on this coup!

6 posted on 03/07/2012 6:35:58 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Subpoena White House access lists, including clearance to the Executive Office Building and the Old Executive Office Building. I bet she is on there.


8 posted on 03/07/2012 6:38:05 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Imagine the rationalizations on FR to vote for MITT if he wins the nomination. I think I'd throw up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Does anyone think, that at some point in the future, Fluke will realize that all that happened was that she got played by the Democratic establishment? Basically, making her a wh**e for them. They put her up there, promised her all sorts of things and when this stuff blows over and isn’t an issue anymore, she’s done. Her 15 minutes are up. No one will answer her call, reply to her texts/emails. Will she realize that the Dem establishment is nothing but a bunch of pimps in dark suits, mooching off the taxpayer?


9 posted on 03/07/2012 6:38:56 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
These things are always orchestrated. Tammy Bruce (and she should know being a former big player in the liberal world) says not even the Rosa Parks/bus incident was happenstance.

"Most Americans believe that the civil-rights struggle was full of serendipity. that it was a spontaneous grassroots movement of average people who wanted to make a difference and improve their lives. Rosa Parks, for example, has been portrayed as an Everywoman who happened to take the bus one day in 1955 and somehow crashed through the barriers of her ordinary, run-of-the-mill life by deciding not to relinquish her seat to a white man.

In truth, the Montgomery, Alabama, chapter of the NAACP had been looking for months for a test case to challenge bus segregation. For this, they needed a bus rider to be arrested so their challenge could move through the courts but it had to be the right sort of bus rider. In fact, Parks wasn’t the first black to refuse to relinquish a seat to a white person. The first to personally challenge bus segregation earlier in 1955 had been 15-year-old Claudette Colvin, followed by another teenager named Mary Louise Smith. The NAACP leaders, however, didn’t think that either of the girls would cut the right kind of figure in court.

Parks was a veteran activist and an officer of the Montgomery NAACP. In actuality, she wielded great power in the chapter; she was the one who had noticed Martin Luther King Jr. and asked him to join the executive committee. She was at the meeting where the Montgomery NAACP leaders considered the possibility of using Colvin or Smith as the test case.

In December of 1955, six weeks after the NAACP’s rejection of the teenagers, Parks was arrested for refusing to give up her seat. Parks told Time magazine, “I did not get on the bus to get anested. I got on the bus to go home” That may have been true for Colvin and Smith but certainly not for Parks, Rosa Parks was a “bus rider" the way Betty Friedan was a 'housewife'."

10 posted on 03/07/2012 6:39:49 AM PST by TennesseeGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

This is how Libs win. They control a vast empire of propogandists with national and international reach, funded largely by taxpayer money. Conservatives operate as individuals, or at best, small groups crying into rain barrels, funded locally with private money. Of course the Libs win every national issue. We still haven’t learned.


12 posted on 03/07/2012 6:42:04 AM PST by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound; All
Criminey! "Arrested", not "anested". Wish FreeRepublic had a spellcheck lol.
13 posted on 03/07/2012 6:43:13 AM PST by TennesseeGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Maloney is a “housewife” from Nassau County NY. The Dims asked her to run because her husband was killed and son crippled on the LIRR by Ferguson. They thought she would win sympathy, a seat and be an anti gun advocate...not that Ferguson hadn't violated at least ten existing Federal, State and Local laws in doing what he did.

Point being she is and was nothing but a puppet of the Dims and this is her doing their bidding

14 posted on 03/07/2012 6:43:42 AM PST by Tuketu (The Dim Platform is splinters bound by crazy glue. We need a solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

1) why should elderly on fixed incomes, etc. should pay more taxes so Ms. fluke can have sex?
2) What sincerely aspiring attorney got bumped out of georgetown so that this woman can play political games?


17 posted on 03/07/2012 6:48:26 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Lake was quoted as saying Obama’s stance on contraception is enough to “really irritate” independent suburban moms and “re-engage” young, single women who haven’t tuned into the campaign so far.

Hordes of brain-dead zombies suddenly rising up to vote for free birth control, without reference to the Mengele-esque aspects of the "Death-Care" bill.

Apparently Obama does have a better "story" for this type of voter (Suburban Grifter Nihilist "slut" Voter).

19 posted on 03/07/2012 6:50:19 AM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Fluke is so much the personification of liberalism—

Unattractive, unfeminine, pro-abortion, absolutely no sense of responsibility, in favor other paying for herself, and biggest of all, she so fully embraces her VICTIMHOOD.


22 posted on 03/07/2012 6:59:13 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

A couple of weeks ago George Stephanopolous asked Rick Santorum in a debate his standing on contraception. This was weird and “out of the clear blue sky”. A week or so later on Meet the Press David Gregory did the same thing. Then up pops Ms. Fluke with her “testimony” to a panel of Democrats only about the evil Georgetown not paying for her contraceptives and abortifacients Only a fool would consider this scenario a coincidence. It was organized by the DNC, the White House or both.


26 posted on 03/07/2012 7:51:54 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Did the congresswomen who pushed Fluke’s testimony coordinate with a marketing and polling outfit that recently conducted a survey to determine whether contraception mandates can become a possible presidential election issue?

According to some reports, it was Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., who pushed for Fluke’s testimony. Maloney also initiated the call for Fluke to sue Rush Limbaugh for his on-air derogatory remark about Fluke, according to the Daily Beast.

All this AFTER her original testimony at the hearing on Obamacare was rejected because the 'Rats in charge of the congressional hearing found she lacked expertise on the subject of the hearing: Obamacare.

34 posted on 03/07/2012 12:16:34 PM PST by Publius6961 (“It’s easy to make phony promises you can’t keep.” - Obama, Feb23, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Congressional Democrats and progressive interest groups are more than capable of finding someone like this and putting her forward without the White House being involved.

I wouldn't be surprised if the general theme "Republican War on Women" came from the White House and the Obama campaign.

But the original choice to testify at the hearing was a man. Somebody there, among the congressional Democrats and staffers, saw that it would have to be a woman, and picked Fluck.

Anything is possible, but I suspect she was too low down on the food chain for Obama or his people to have noticed her on their own.

FWIW, there's a little bit of a backlash or backwash or blowback on the left. Nothing really important, but some bloggers and commenters complain about Obama's "your parents should be proud of you" as patronizing and infantilizing a 30-year old woman.

40 posted on 03/07/2012 5:40:59 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson