Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Pork Kills Keystone
Townhall.com ^ | March 9, 2012 | John Ransom

Posted on 03/08/2012 6:57:03 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Michael.SF.

I know of no refinery or other facility that has the capacity to load or unload 1500 cars every day. There would have to be some very large discharge tanks on the unload end to accomodate the arrivals.
With the heavy gravity of this oil, the cars might have to be steamed overnight, so add four or five days of product at the off-load.
Think about the jam-up of 7500 asphalt capable jumbos... Yike !


21 posted on 03/09/2012 4:40:24 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
With the heavy gravity of this oil

It depends if it goes through an upgrader in Canada first. The production that is shipping Bitumen is diluting it with Naphtha or the like first, referred to as Dilbit.

There have been several bitumen upgraders built in Canada and more planned. With this process a rather high grade of light Syncrude is produced.

Essentially the problems you discuss with heavies are a problem for the pipelines as well. Meaning that the heavy gravity issues are already resolved.

The volume issue still exists. This would have to be broken up to many different refineries every day to be handled. But the pipeline would do the same so also no real change.

Cheers

22 posted on 03/09/2012 5:10:02 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I've had a look at some of the gravities on post upgrader oil and have wondered how it moves through a pipe.
Didn't some light cuts get routed back to Alberta as cutter stock ?
23 posted on 03/09/2012 5:21:45 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I've had a look at some of the gravities on post upgrader oil and have wondered how it moves through a pipe.

You have seen more than I then. I have read the descriptions of what the upgrader is supposed to accomplish. I wonder if they blend in bitumen to the limit of the ability to flow.

It may be the difference between a minimal upgrading and full upgrading, done differently by different companies.

http://www.ualberta.ca/~gray/Library/Tutorials/Upgrading/sld001.htm

Didn't some light cuts get routed back to Alberta as cutter stock ?

I believe that is true.

24 posted on 03/09/2012 5:27:16 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Here is the output specification from one of the largest oil sands producer (Syncrude) in Canada.

http://www.cdnoilsands.com/energy-marketing/ProductSpecifications/default.aspx


25 posted on 03/09/2012 5:32:51 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The actual amendment is Senate Amendment 1537 to Senate Bill 1813" (pdf format) (SB 1813 is the current budget bill.)

The tally can be found on this page.

The Hall of Shame:

NAYs ---42
Akaka (D-HI)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Coons (D-DE)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting - 2
Kirk (R-IL)
Thune (R-SD)

26 posted on 03/09/2012 5:34:20 AM PST by snowsislander (Gingrich 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

And why is Philadelphia on that map?...Marcus Hook, which is dieing this year.


27 posted on 03/09/2012 5:50:42 AM PST by Safetgiver (I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

BFL


28 posted on 03/09/2012 6:36:51 AM PST by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
What are the names of the 11 Democrats who broke ranks with Bottleneck Reid, and the former foreign student from Harvard Law School?

you can't read too much into the 11, since the dems had enough to stop the vote. Several were likely given 'permission' by the party to break ranks due to election concerns.

29 posted on 03/09/2012 6:39:46 AM PST by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
You think it was a coincidence that Obama told Reid and Pelosi, just the day before, he would not be contributing to their campaign coffers? Bet ya they're getting the money now, along with all the others who went against it. I'll bet ya that's what he told them in the phone calls he made.
30 posted on 03/09/2012 6:42:56 AM PST by liberalh8ter (Barack has a memory like a steel trap; it's a gift ~ Michelle Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All

Thanks!

I am looking for ANY crack in the stonewall of the Free Lunch Democrat Party.

I have no interest in the “true believers” because they are no longer subject to rational thought.

I am fully aware of the possibility of “allowing” free-lunchers to look good to their voters, but it also puts them in the traitor class with the robo-voting, true-believers of the Free Lunch Democrat Party.

BTW, who ultimately pays for the free lunch?


31 posted on 03/09/2012 7:18:58 AM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
BNR has 61 loading facilities in the Bakken region alone. They are well positioned to move the oil to multiple locations. Perhaps not all of it, but a significant amount of it will move via RR.


32 posted on 03/09/2012 7:22:52 AM PST by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

” - - - Not Voting - 2
Kirk (R-IL)
Thune (R-SD)”

Why were these turkeys playing hooky? Maybe they weren’t “shovel ready.”


33 posted on 03/09/2012 7:23:00 AM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Excellent! Bookmarked for leisure reading by anti jobs, Free Lunch Democrat lurkers.


34 posted on 03/09/2012 7:26:46 AM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
the Democrats presumably prefer the new triangle-slavery route. Canada ships oil to China, China creates jobs, US imports dollars from China to pay for entitlement programs to support people who don’t have jobs here domestically.

Of COURSE they do!

It keeps our economy down while inflating the economies of other countries thus keeping their dream of one day being the 'elite' ruling class of a one world government alive.

On the other hand, it's not nice to try to fool the Laws of Nature.

One day, the payback's gonna be a real Bitch.

35 posted on 03/09/2012 8:19:20 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am a ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Just as soon as the GOP is done with its self immolation campaign.


36 posted on 03/09/2012 9:03:26 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson