[mkjessup]

First of all, lest we need reminding: the only poll that counts is the one on election day.

Second? Even IF this Rasmussen poll is to be believed, Mitt-Witt theoretically leads 0bama by 5 percentage points, i.e. BFD. That is close enough to the margin of error combined with the usual 'Rat vote stealing tactics to put our Kenyan version of Mugabe back in the White House for as many years as he decides to stay.

Third? The only difference between Romney and 0bama is that (as I've said before) if 0bama is re-elected we continue to have the bottle labeled 'Socialism' poured down our throats against our will as the federal behemoth continues to expand it's power in every aspect of our lives. If ROMNEY somehow managed to pull off a win in November? We still get socialism poured down our throats, except it will be served up in exquisite crystal goblets, as befits a Bishop of Romney's standing.

It is my view that the prime motivation for Romney running for President is to somehow exonerate and avenge his Daddy's loss in '68.

Romney: "Say thar, where can I git one of them grit-eatin' licenses?"

Mitt-Witt is the most fake sonuvabitch to come down the highway in decades.

[PapaNew]

Mitt-Witt is...fake

That's true and it's bad. But what's worse is Obama is REAL and doesn't make any bones about it - he doesn't have to because the media is his re-election committee and apparently there's enough people in this country that think it's cool to elect (re-elect???) a left-of-socialist union organizer as POTUS (Chairman?) of the former USA.

[Milagros]

The meaning of the poll is that Obama is losing ground, not that Romney is ‘gaining’