Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forced Meds? Climate-change skepticism must be 'treated', says enviro-sociologist.
The Register ^ | March 30, 2012 | Lewis Page

Posted on 03/30/2012 6:13:37 PM PDT by aruanan

Climate-change scepticism must be 'treated', says enviro-sociologist

Dubious on warmo peril? You're the kind who'd own slaves


Scepticism regarding the need for immediate and massive action against carbon emissions is a sickness of societies and individuals which needs to be "treated", according to an Oregon-based professor of "sociology and environmental studies". Professor Kari Norgaard compares the struggle against climate scepticism to that against racism and slavery in the US South.

Prof Norgaard holds a B.S. in biology and a master's and PhD in sociology.

"Over the past ten years I have published and taught in the areas of environmental sociology, gender and environment, race and environment, climate change, sociology of culture, social movements and sociology of emotions," she says.

(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climate; climatechange; climategate; climategate2; deniers; environmentalist; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; sovietstyletreatment; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: Charles Martel
While you're at it, offer a petition up to St. Gabriel Possenti.

I just googled it.

I am *so* stealing that.

Cheers!

81 posted on 04/01/2012 4:31:20 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I love how when a liberal compares one regulated activity with an unregulated one (and the comparisons in themselves are even sometimes valid), it's always immediately assumed that the UNregulated sphere is the wrong one, that its regulation has to INCREASE to harmonize with the regulated one.

It would seem to me the presumption would be for freedom, that if in two similar cases, one regulated and one not, neither is causing problems it proves the HIGHER regulation is unnecessary.

82 posted on 04/01/2012 9:59:45 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"It’s sad that Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney might agree..."

-----

Mitt? Yes. Newt? Nonsense. Watch this and telle me if that makes any sense:

www.youtube.com/watchv=44fPSn7VxKs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

You can fast forward to the last minute to see Newt vivisecting Pigman Waxman."

And please spare me the BS about Newt doing a PSA with Nazi Pelosi. I think congressional testimony trumps a stuipid PSA.

Hank

83 posted on 04/03/2012 7:05:26 PM PDT by County Agent Hank Kimball (Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

I am eagerly awaiting (not really) his next book on global warming in November. nah.


84 posted on 04/03/2012 8:57:24 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson