Posted on 03/30/2012 6:13:37 PM PDT by aruanan
Climate-change scepticism must be 'treated', says enviro-sociologist
Dubious on warmo peril? You're the kind who'd own slaves
Scepticism regarding the need for immediate and massive action against carbon emissions is a sickness of societies and individuals which needs to be "treated", according to an Oregon-based professor of "sociology and environmental studies". Professor Kari Norgaard compares the struggle against climate scepticism to that against racism and slavery in the US South.
Prof Norgaard holds a B.S. in biology and a master's and PhD in sociology.
"Over the past ten years I have published and taught in the areas of environmental sociology, gender and environment, race and environment, climate change, sociology of culture, social movements and sociology of emotions," she says.
(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...
I just googled it.
I am *so* stealing that.
Cheers!
It would seem to me the presumption would be for freedom, that if in two similar cases, one regulated and one not, neither is causing problems it proves the HIGHER regulation is unnecessary.
-----
Mitt? Yes. Newt? Nonsense. Watch this and telle me if that makes any sense:
www.youtube.com/watchv=44fPSn7VxKs&feature=youtube_gdata_player
You can fast forward to the last minute to see Newt vivisecting Pigman Waxman."
And please spare me the BS about Newt doing a PSA with Nazi Pelosi. I think congressional testimony trumps a stuipid PSA.
Hank
I am eagerly awaiting (not really) his next book on global warming in November. nah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.