Four months ago I read a report that deep ocean warming hadn’t altered much.
Scientific American has become politicized, so I no longer credit them with veracity.
.1 degrees change from readings taken 130 years ago. That has to be much less than the margin of error.
If any of you have a 135 year-old diesel engine, I’ll buy it if it still runs.
National Geographic also.
It was very serious when humanists moved into business and science departments of University and culturally cleansed western ethics. Now it is realitivity and scientific process means nil. They always controled the soft sciences and they made no sense but everyone knew they were socialist political activists. Now they own hard science and so the West’s progress will decline accordingly.
Scientific American has become politicized, so I no longer credit them with veracity.
So you consider an increase of 0.1 degrees to be an exaggeration?