Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: U-238
Agree. Lee was a genius, who anticpated what the North would do. He just didn't have the resources. Gave me a whole new appreciation for what he COULD have done.

If he had the abilty, the Confederacy could have conceivably won.

But that's another argument for another day.

14 posted on 04/04/2012 1:15:54 AM PDT by boop (I hate hippies and dopeheads. Just hate them. ...Ernest Borgnine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: boop

If Judah Benjamin was able to convince the British and French to send troops to join the Confederacy, things would have been totally different. Lee might have taken the North


16 posted on 04/04/2012 1:24:09 AM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: boop

I think that people need to realize that the brilliance of Lee as a general was brought forth precisely because the strategic situation for him was so desperate. He HAD to accept a higher level of risk in his dispositions.

Grant had a similar capacity when you look at his western campaigns. He also knew when to gamble. But the consensus view of Grant as a brute-force general was formed during the Wilderness Campaign & the Seige of Petersburg. It’s a view of Grant that still is with us today.


49 posted on 04/04/2012 4:36:19 AM PDT by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson