Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking
Still Thinking said: "... the county stands pat on their current position. "

I don't think so.

There's a case to be made that the county changed their interpretation at the last minute in order to moot the case.

At one time, the county stated that the Nordykes could hold a gun show as long as there were no guns present. It was ridiculously suggested that they could use pictures of guns.

The county may have avoided a losing session at the Ninth Circuit, but the case is not over. I would be confident that the Nordykes will insist, as they should, that you can't have a gun show without selling ammunition.

The Ninth Circuit was so willing to dump the case that they didn't allow this topic to be discussed. After years of representing their ordinance as a gun ban, the county suddenly claims that tethered guns would be allowed.

6 posted on 04/04/2012 8:44:08 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

But it was never really a gun ban, because re-enactments and the like were allowed. This was purely and has always been a vendetta by Mary King and the Board of Supervisors against Russ & Sally.


7 posted on 04/05/2012 7:50:18 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson