[af_vet_rr]

Romney, should he be elected, will likely be like Dwight Eisenhower, a semi-conservative leader. He will not be a Reagan and hopefully not a Nixon. Typically, he’ll ride the line right between the two and that makes him similar to Eisenhower.

LMAO, where you getting this crazy idea?

Because Romney's electoral history goes against everything you just said.

Romney's one election win was done running on a pro-abortion, pro-sodomy platform. Once he realized he couldn't win another term, and started eying the White House, he pretended to change his stances and pretended to be a Conservative, but his entire political history before he started running for the White House was based on a very liberal mindset.

The only difference between a liberal like Romney with an (R) next to his name, and a liberal like Obama with a (D) next to his name is how fast they are going to take you down the road to socialism. Obama wants to head there at top speed, Romney is willing to go slow enough that gullible Republicans don't realize where he's taking them.

And may God help us, because there are a lot of gullible Republicans who are burying their heads in the sand over Romney.

[cotton1706]

I’m from MA. I know what Romney’s like. As an executive, I don’t see him being as liberal as Nixon. He see’s which way the winds blow and if more conservatives are elected to congress, he’ll move in that direction. He’s not a principled and determined man like Reagan. That’s why I see him more as an Eisenhower, a sort-of milquetoast, moderate politician. Not an activist like a Hoover or a go along with whatever the congress passes like Nixon. And not an agenda setter like Reagan. Typical of Romney, some sort of meandering executive.