With what is happneing right now, Romney probably thinks he doesn’t have to get his handss dirty, heck, Wright himself is going after Obama, claiming in a taped interview that the Obama campaign tried to bribe him to keep him silent, and that as Obama’s Pastor he made it easy for Obama to come to his church and keep his Isslmaic roots, and when asked on the tape if he was certain that Obama had converted to Jesus Christ, Wright said, “I cannot say that.”
So, let them tear each other apart and let Hannity and the PACS do all the work. Hannity has the tape anbd will air more of it tonight. Good stuff too.
Romney will take the fight to Obama, and he is getting the RNC to do the same. Thay have already unleashed more attacks on Obama, and more directly, than McCain did as a candidate, and Romney is not even the nomniee yet.
I believe he has to go after Obama and he has to do it wisely, but directly using his own words and his own people against him. Who better to use against Obama than Wright himself who cannot contain his mouth about his anti-American sentiments, and who is ticked off at Obama for being dissed by him and his admin.
Let’s see how it plays out. To announce this and then to allow Hannity and the PACS to take care of business would not be a bad move given the environment and what is already happening, ie. Wright himself upset and saying these things about Obama.
Obama’s Disasterous Firsts as President
http://www.jeffhead.com/obama1sts.htm
How are you going to push him in the direction you want, if you keep defending him when his actions or decisions are questionable?
Especially now that you've signaled to him that you have no choice but to support him even though you have to grit your teeth to do so.
His thinking: "Heck, they've got no choice. I'll do what I want."
I know school teachers who go ballistic at the beginning of the school year on extremely little things their kids do. They do it on purpose. They say it gives the kids the idea, "If she gets that upset over this tiny thing, then I'm not pushing her on any of the big stuff."
Well, only took 9 days for you to do an abrupt shift re: commenting upon the religiosity of POTUS candidates, eh, Jeff?
May 8, 2012, to NoRedTape: Do you really have to make this thread an anti-LDS thing? ...As to religion, if you must make it about that... Source: Santorum endorses one-time rival Romney
No religious hypocrisy being practiced here, eh, Jeff?
Tis OK to make threads an anti-Islamic "thing" as long as it pertains to Obama, eh? But Mormonism is somehow "sacrosanct" from similar dissection?
Crass religio-political hypocrisy, Jeff!