Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Las Vegas Dave
There appears to be a lack of understanding, legal precedent, or any clarity at all, in our founding documents and laws that describe who, and when the Presidential requirement to be a NBC is to be asserted or challenged. This needs fixing.

Yes I am a birther but I have no clue what Zero has in his background he has sealed everything. DOESN'T that in itself make the 4th estate a little curious? Just a little? CELARLY NOBODY is going to go up against the 1/6 of 1/2 BLACK man who has set history here by getting the sheeple of America to install him in the WH. He IS the Manchurian Candidate, and he was put here by the CPUSA.
46 posted on 05/19/2012 7:28:52 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cheerio
"There appears to be a lack of understanding, legal precedent, or any clarity at all, in our founding documents and laws that describe who, and when the Presidential requirement to be a NBC is to be asserted or challenged. This needs fixing."

It's called the Twentieth Amendment, Section 3. The burden of proof is on the one seeking the office and he/she must offer this proof to Congress. If there is no proof, he/she has "failed to qualify" and Congress must name an interim president. In this instance, Congress has simply ignored it's oath to support the Constitution and we have a usurpation as the result. We currently do not have a President, just a "resident".

51 posted on 05/19/2012 8:11:45 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson