NOW. ANY QUESTIONS?????!!!!!!
Posted on 05/25/2012 5:52:53 AM PDT by suspects
Some advice to the folks at Marylou’s coffee chain, now under investigation by the EEOC, on how to fight back:
Start laughing.
Back during the Clinton years the EEOC went after Hooters for its alleged hiring bias (we all remember how hard Bill Clinton was on women... uh, let me re-phrase that). Hooters refused to hire men to wear the infamous “orange short-shorts and white tank-top” ensemble. The EEOC spent four years pressuring them to hire male waiters, which would have ruined the Hooters concept.
Hooters tried reasoning and logic. As one would expect when dealing with bureaucrats, they failed miserably. So Hooters turned to anther weapon: mockery.
They put up billboards showing what a hairy, beer-bellied guy would actually look like in Hooters garb. They took out newspaper ads showing a bearded guy in a blonde wig and Hooters T-shirt saying “Come on, Washington. Get a grip.”
It worked. The EEOC stayed just as stupid — still insisting that Hooters was doing something wrong — but it became clear that if they kept pushing the stupidity, Congress might step up and take away some of their power. So the EEOC “quietly ended its investigation,” according to the Los Angeles Times.
Today, dimwit EEOC attorneys in yet another Democratic administration are at it again — this time in Massachusetts. As the Herald reported yesterday, the EEOC “has been quietly probing Marylou’s’ hiring practices for nearly a year . . . grilling the 29-store chain’s pink-clad clerks about their co-workers’ gender, age, race and body type, according to the company.”
Let’s get something on the record. Yes, Marylou’s “discriminates.” Every employer “discriminates.” If they didn’t, I’d be working as a Chippendales dancer.
If you own a business, you...
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
EEOC. Probably run by UGLY chicks.
Now, how can we properly evaluate this claim without photographic evidence??
TTIWWOP.
NOW. ANY QUESTIONS?????!!!!!!
MaryLou’s CEO should offer jobs to every democrat woman in congress- that would even-out the attractiveness factor
Fridays were never so FUN!!
Why doesn’t somebody bring a case with EEOC that Harvard won’t hire them because the University is discriminating against stupid people?
A plot right out of Seinfeld.
ANY QUESTIONS???!!!!!
I think Hollywood should be investigated for not hiring enough ugly actresses. Why shouldn’t unattractive, overweight, non-talented women have a chance at stardom, too?
communist soetoro’s choom gang...
http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/a-users-guide-to-smoking-pot-with-barack-obama
” Why shouldn’t unattractive, overweight, non-talented women have a chance at stardom, too? “
Well, they do have their niche in Democrat Politics and the Bureaucracy, after all...
Company was probably started by BAIN CAPITAL and this is Obummer’s message to the owners not to support Romney.
Obama would like the company to employ Pretty Boys instead.
The EEOC can pursue this kind of BS, but then turns a blind eye when Elizabeth Warren lies about being a minority and uses her phony “minority” status to advance her career. Perhaps if the girls at this coffee chain described themselves as being ugly because their mother’s told them so the EEOC wouldn’t have a problem.
I’m betting they all have “master degrees” in Grievance Studies.
Marylou Sandry has built a mini empire here on the South Shore and I say bravo to her.
I guess if you’re not smart enough to handle the countries business, you go after Hooters. It must be terrible to be that dumb.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.