Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NE Cons

Let’s see what our first commander-in-chief thought about sodomy in the US Armed Forces.

http://www.wnd.com/2011/01/248125/

“Here’s how the father of our country saw it: “It is required and expected that exact discipline be observed and due subordination prevail thro’ the whole Army, as a failure in these most essential points must necessarily produce extreme hazard, disorder, and confusions; and end in shameful disappointment and disgrace. The General most earnestly requires and expects a due observance of those articles of war established for the government of the Army which forbid profane cursing, swearing, and drunkenness; And in like manner requires and expects of all officers and soldiers not engaged on actual duty a punctual attendance on Divine service to implore the blessings of Heaven upon the means used for our safety and defence.

“His Excellency [George Washington] wishes [it] to be considered that an Army without order, regularity, and discipline is no better than a commissioned mob; Let us therefore … endeavor by all the skill and discipline in our power, to acquire that knowledge and conduct which is necessary in war – our men are brave and good; men who with pleasure it is observed are addicted to fewer vices than are commonly found in Armies; but it is subordination and discipline (the life and soul of an Army) which next under Providence, is to make us formidable to our enemies, honorable in ourselves, and respected in the world.

“Purity of morals being the only sure foundation of public happiness in any country and highly conducive to order, subordination, and success in an Army, it will be well worthy the emulation of officers of every rank and class to encourage it both by the influence of example and the penalties of authority. It is painful to see many shameful instances of riot and licentiousness. … A regard to decency should conspire with a sense of morality to banish a vice productive of neither advantage or pleasure.”

Which approach makes more sense to you – George Washington’s or Barack Obama’s?


79 posted on 06/10/2012 4:25:40 PM PDT by NKP_Vet (creep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet
Which approach makes more sense to you – George Washington’s or Barack Obama’s?

What about Mitt Romney's approach?

But hey, it's ABO, right?

95 posted on 06/10/2012 6:05:01 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson