[Fred Nerks]

THE MODEL WITH STANLEY ANN DUNHAM IN THE MIDDLE

edge919 - YOUR CREATION - SUPERIMPOSING STANLEY ANN DUNHAM'S FACE OVER THE FACE OF THE MODEL

AN INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF THE IMAGES:

I have taken the two heads and rotated them a few degrees clockwise to obtain a level line through the eyes and a vertical line bisecting the features.

The heads had been adjusted to present the same height: 6 cm.

The heads are then aligned so that a horizontal line touches their chins, and another, touches the tops of their heads.

With like sized heads on the same level the features (lips, nose, eyes) do NOT align.

A contrarian might say, "The angle is different," but if it's the same person, the same 6 cm image height, the angle ought to be the same.

I find the nostrils are dramatically different--and we know the profile of the noses are different--profile does NOT show up in frontal view.

I, too, find the EARS are vastly different: Model has tapered lobes, attached, and angling toward the head, while the HSG has separate and pendulous lobes of elephantine proportions, just what we would expect looking at her father Stanley Armour Dunham's gigantic ears.

[little jeremiah]

I’d say that is quite definitive and not only puts to rest the “SAD was a porn model” myth but drives a stake into its heart and burns in in a funeral pyre.

[edge919]

This isn't very compelling because the same "analysis" can be done with the two images of "the model." Once the chins and the top of the head are lined up, the mouths, noses and eyes do NOT line up. It would be difficult from these pictures to say that this is even the same woman.

However, when we do that same analysis with the images that I previously overlayed, we get a much different result:

Now, the alignment is much more similar. To get such alignment between the two images of "the model", then the left image has to be skewed and stretched. I didn't have to do any of that with the right image and the yearbook picture. Reasons for the differences in all these pictures can be accounted for by camera angle, focal length, facial expression, time of the month, etc. The other thing that hasn't been accounted for is that SAD's high school picture was most likely retouched, while the other images do not look like they were retouched.

The bottom line is that nothing here rules out the model (or the right model) from being the same woman as in the high school yearbook picture. All I know is that when I superimposed one image on top of the other and vice versa, the alignment was uncanny. If I could make an animated gif, I could really show well these images line up by sliding the opacity back and forth.

[PhilDragoo]

With the two women's heads vertical and the same size their differences are apparent.

Had the photos been of the same woman, when aligned with facial features plumb and head heights evened all features would be in alignment.

That they are not indicates they are two individuals.

Other apparent individualities include the HSG's nostrils are asymmetrical; Model's nothing at all alike.

HSG's ears are large and pendulous, just as her father's; Model's ears nothing like this.

The HSG's face is slender, thin, while Model's is full, rounder.

There is a link to Frank Marshall Davis and it is that Stanley Armour Dunham was his associate, and Davis was Obama's mentor from ages 9 through 18.