Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All; BIGLOOK
Despite the "good intentions" this ruling was a give-me. There was no justification for how the law was written since it overextends into private communications rather more narrowly aiming for cases where fraud is occurring.

Real constitutional conservatives would understand this.

23 posted on 06/28/2012 12:00:38 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
If the Stolen Valor Act limited itself to cases where fraud was occurring, then it would have been completely unnecessary. The last thing we need is another Federal law that makes it a Federal crime to do something that is already illegal in any U.S. state.
47 posted on 06/28/2012 3:25:40 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
Real constitutional conservatives would understand this.

Yeah. But we get flamed here for saying Kennedy is actually the real CONSERVATIVE on SCOTUS.

What passes for "conservative" among Repubs are actually authoritarians. They live in the days of the Warren Court. The dissent in this case is scary.

56 posted on 06/30/2012 11:38:45 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Let's name a law after a kid who died because of CAFE standards!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson