I agree with you. I regularly read comments following articles in many newspapers and websites. My observation is that, in 2009, after Obama was inaugurated, comments being posted were running 95-99% pro-Obama. GOP voters or conservatives were on the run. Now, in 2012, the proportion has flipped, depending on the venue. Even in the NYT and WaPO, I see anti-Obama comments, in the latter maybe 80%, in th Times, maybe 25-50%, depending on the topic. It’s been a sea change, and it gives me confidence that Americans have seen Obama and the criminal democrat party - and the criminally complicit MSM - for what they are and have done to our country. We will take it back, we wil prevail.
However, I vehemently oppose Marco Rubio as VP for two reasons, unrelated to his politics because I am behind him all the way as a Senator. First -he is much too young, and will be devastated by the MSM attacks on him from that angle. Second - he is not a natural born citizen of the US, just like Barack Obama. But, he is a conservative, so that issue will be key with the media. They will crucify him and the GOP - mark my words. He is ineligible to become POTUS.
Then he can be passed over as president and still serve as vp. Is that correct?