Replies

According to the site you reference the story was that "Romney was a “passive, limited partner [with] no management capacity", not that he had absolutely no involvement with Bain.

I believe others have already pointed out that he was THE SOLE OWNER of Bain at the time, or the sole owner of the financial fund involved in these activities.

So, the Sole Owner's company is outsourcing jobs and raking in the big bucks with a trade in the bodies of murdered babies, and he bears no responsibility for any of that.

Sure guys.

How about this, the neighborhood procurer was getting tired of dealing directly with the girls in his stable so he hired a bunch of street thugs to take over the jobs and give him both expansion in the market place and some vacation time. The cops busted his employees. Ross claimed to be innocent since he didn't actually hustle the girls directly.

Now that's a true story ~ and the cops went ahead and busted Ross anyway.

You will need a comprehensive story that demonstrates that Romney had absolutely no contact with his money, and gave it all away to charity or something. So far this one is not smelling right at all.